<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Guest Post: Stephen Kershnar on The Mystery of the Trinity</title>
	<atom:link href="http://trinities.org/blog/archives/591/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://trinities.org/blog/archives/591</link>
	<description>theories about the father, son, and holy spirit</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 13:51:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Scott</title>
		<link>http://trinities.org/blog/archives/591/comment-page-1#comment-90604</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2009 12:41:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trinities.org/blog/?p=591#comment-90604</guid>
		<description>&quot;profoundly solid&quot;? Last time I checked ecumenical councils put such a view outside the bounds of orthodoxy. Such a position must be argued for -- you can&#039;t just assume it. Is it also profoundly solid to say that the &quot;heavenly Father&quot; used to be a human being in another universe and at some point in time became the god of this universe?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;profoundly solid&#8221;? Last time I checked ecumenical councils put such a view outside the bounds of orthodoxy. Such a position must be argued for &#8212; you can&#8217;t just assume it. Is it also profoundly solid to say that the &#8220;heavenly Father&#8221; used to be a human being in another universe and at some point in time became the god of this universe?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel Ortner</title>
		<link>http://trinities.org/blog/archives/591/comment-page-1#comment-90603</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Ortner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 20:26:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trinities.org/blog/?p=591#comment-90603</guid>
		<description>Just to make an important clarification. Belief in multiple Gods or deities is not inherently polytheistic so long as one of those deities are supreme. Members of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints view the members of the godhead as completely distinct beings united as one in purpose but not in being. They maintain that God ( Heavenly Father) is the supreme being to which all in the Universe ( including Jesus and the Holy Ghost) recognize as supreme. This to me seems a profoundly solid biblical and christian position.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just to make an important clarification. Belief in multiple Gods or deities is not inherently polytheistic so long as one of those deities are supreme. Members of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints view the members of the godhead as completely distinct beings united as one in purpose but not in being. They maintain that God ( Heavenly Father) is the supreme being to which all in the Universe ( including Jesus and the Holy Ghost) recognize as supreme. This to me seems a profoundly solid biblical and christian position.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: trinities - Thinking about the Trinity (Dale)</title>
		<link>http://trinities.org/blog/archives/591/comment-page-1#comment-90345</link>
		<dc:creator>trinities - Thinking about the Trinity (Dale)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2009 11:25:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trinities.org/blog/?p=591#comment-90345</guid>
		<description>[...] wrote this as a response to Steve&#8217;s column, but perhaps the editors had had enough philosophical theology in the paper. Either that, or they [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] wrote this as a response to Steve&#8217;s column, but perhaps the editors had had enough philosophical theology in the paper. Either that, or they [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
