“Trinity” @ the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Dale)

finishlineLittle known fact: overwork causes one’s neck to become invisible!

After an embarrassing amount of time, I’ve finally finished my encyclopedia entry on the Trinity for the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (as well as lengthy supplementary documents on the history of Trinity doctrines, Judaic and Islamic objections, and unitarianism).

Since I can’t thank them in the entry, I’d like to thank editors Ed Zalta and Uri Nodelman for their help, and their patience in working through many issues that arose. Also, thanks to SEP philosophy of religion editor Ed Wierenga, for his comments on a draft, and help in figuring up how to divide up the enormous thing.

My thanks to those who offered helpful comments on various drafts, including James Anderson, and trinities bloggers Joseph Jedwab, JT Paasch, and Scott Williams. I also benefited from correspondence with Richard Cross, and with historian Dean Grodzins.

Many parts of the entries are related to my previous posts here at trinities, so I have to also thank everyone who commented on those as well.

It took so long, a couple of sections are already a little out of date!

Finally: become a friend of the SEP. I’m going to I did. Friends get to download really awesome pdfs of the entries, which look & print like book pages.

Update: discussion over at Prosblogion.

Share:
  • Reddit
  • Digg
  • StumbleUpon
  • del.icio.us
  • Furl
  • Facebook
  • BlogMemes
  • blogmarks
  • De.lirio.us
  • Google Bookmarks
  • NewsVine
  • YahooMyWeb
  • LinkedIn
  • TwitThis

Comments 6

  1. Joseph Jedwab wrote:

    Congratulations Dale! Super cool.

    Posted 24 Jul 2009 at 3:50 pm
  2. Scott wrote:

    Wicked cool.

    Posted 24 Jul 2009 at 7:20 pm
  3. JT Paasch wrote:

    Oye, che bueno! What a labor of love, baby.

    Posted 25 Jul 2009 at 9:55 am
  4. Evan wrote:

    Thanks again for entertaining my question on Prosblogion. I’m glad I found trinities, and I’ll add it to my reader.

    Posted 28 Jul 2009 at 8:54 am
  5. Zach Blaesi wrote:

    Great! I’ve been looking forward to this. Keep the good work up on the website, there’s not enough philosophical treatments of the Trinity out there!

    Posted 08 Sep 2009 at 1:42 am
  6. Fortigurn wrote:

    Dale, I happened to be reading that entry just the other day. I’m very interested to know you’re the author, it’s always good to be able to talk with someone who makes an entry in such a scholarly work. I found your article extremely informative. I’m still only part way through it, but I’m learning a great deal. Thank you.

    Posted 25 Apr 2010 at 12:23 pm

Post a Comment

Your email is never published nor shared. Required fields are marked *