podcast 378 – Debate: Is Jesus Yahweh? White vs. Tuggy – Part 2
Mutual interrogations, closing statements, and audio Q&A. In your view, which side won?
Mutual interrogations, closing statements, and audio Q&A. In your view, which side won?
Has Dr. William Lane Craig put forward what is plausibly a biblical and possibly true two-natures theory about the Lord Jesus?
What is “mere” social trinitarianism, and why is it controversial among trinitarian theologians?
A prolific apologist embraces so-called “monarchical trinitarianism,” on which the one God just is the Father, not the Trinity.
A thoughtful Baptist confronts his church about biblical vs. later teachings about God, Jesus, and heresy.
“I had come to this belief truly just through studying the Word.”
Did fourth century Christians come to a consensus about “the doctrine of the Trinity”?
Is the question absurd? Or does it make sense in light of New Testament teachings?
Sacrifice to the gods, or die. What would you do?
Evaluating Dr. Craig’s unique take on “two natures” christology, his “Neo-Apollinarian” theory.
Does Dr. Craig’s “Neo-Apollinarian” theory about Christ show how one person can be both divine and human?
Is there a Trinity theory which is both orthodox and coherent? One apologist’s suggestions, with commentary.
“In essentials, unity; in non-essentials liberty; in all things, love.” So far, so good. But, what does Scripture say is essential teaching about Christ and about God?
What would we expect to find in the New Testament writings if the authors thought Jesus was a man, a god, or a godman?
A humorous puppet-show about a serious subject: properly understanding what the New Testament teaches about Jesus and God.
Dr. Beall explains and defends his suggestion that Christ is a contradiction.
In this episode Dr. Beall explains why he doesn’t accept five consistency-preserving ways to understand the divinity and humanity of Christ.
“It seems that Dr. Craig…in his attempt to equalize the persons has not only failed to elevate Jesus to the status of a god but has brought the Father down to his level. It is a reverse homoousion…”
Review of a learned and insightful yet deeply flawed book.
“…the doctrine of the Trinity is not in Scripture per se, but is the result of the Church’s interpretation of Scripture.”