podcast 320 – Thoughts on my debate with Rogers about Mark – Part 2 – interpretive fails
Adventures in theologically-motivated misinterpretation.
Adventures in theologically-motivated misinterpretation.
Why “that’s just Philosophy” is no excuse for a failure of basic critical thinking.
Cross-examinations, discussion, closing statements, and audience Q&A.
Is this “beginning” when the cosmos was created by God, or when it was “newly created” through the man Jesus?
Does the famous “Great Commission” passage at the end of Matthew teach that the one God is a Trinity?
John 17:1-3, closing statements, and audience Q&A. Which side made the stronger case?
Part 1 of a dialogue from December 2019, including opening brief opening statements and a discussion of John 1.
Who needs the Bible when you can gesture at some philosophical speculations?
Origen sez: you must say that Father and Son are “one God.” But does he think they are?
Post-debate thoughts and more, in dialogue with an ex-biblical-unitarian who is now a trinitarian.
Do I ignore “the” being/Person distinction?
How can they respond to an argument which shows that they collapse the Father/Son distinction?
Interrogations, closing statements, and audience Q & A.
Does the NT teach that Jesus is a man, or that he is a godman?
The debate question is: Jesus is human and not divine.
Want to debate (or just refute) me? Here are some things you should study.