podcast 343 – Craig’s Contradictory Christ – Part 1
Does Dr. Craig’s “Neo-Apollinarian” theory about Christ show how one person can be both divine and human?
Does Dr. Craig’s “Neo-Apollinarian” theory about Christ show how one person can be both divine and human?
In the New Testament, is the Father God himself, or does the Father rather represent the one God?
In saying “my Lord and my God” does Thomas confess that Jesus is truly divine?
Opening statements and rebuttals.
Could each divine “Person” of the Trinity be either an attribute of God or God together with an attribute?
What would we expect to find in the New Testament writings if the authors thought Jesus was a man, a god, or a godman?
In this episode Dr. Beall explains why he doesn’t accept five consistency-preserving ways to understand the divinity and humanity of Christ.
If God is essentially immortal, the answer must be: No. But the human Jesus of the Bible was then mortal.
What is the main thesis of the earliest Christian gospel?
“…the doctrine of the Trinity is not in Scripture per se, but is the result of the Church’s interpretation of Scripture.”
Which parts of Channing’s thought do and don’t hold up today?
In this book, I argue that all reference is story-relative. We cannot understand reference to God, nor to his prophets, nor to any other character mentioned in the Jewish, Christian, or Muslim scriptures, without reference to those very scriptures.
Equally divine or not? Dr. Craig on generation, procession, and the Logos theologians.
“And the Word was God.” Which one? The same mentioned before, or not?
“Dear Christian, I’ve been meaning to talk to you about God and me.”
“Blessed is anyone who endures temptation. Such a one has stood the test and will receive the crown of life that the Lord has promised to those who love him.”
How could the Incarnation continue between Good Friday and Easter Sunday?
Interrogations, closing statements, and audience Q & A.