some clarifications: a reply to McManus – part 3
Is my definition of the concept unitarian so wide that it would allow in some famous trinitarians?
Is my definition of the concept unitarian so wide that it would allow in some famous trinitarians?
Being a unitarian Christian requires a bit more than thinking the one God just is the Father.
A trinitarian ought to say No. But why? Doesn’t he accept “the deity of Christ”?
It’s a bummer when one’s narrative about theological development runs into inconvenient facts.
Equally divine or not? Dr. Craig on generation, procession, and the Logos theologians.
He said this to Jesus. But was he also addressing the God in Jesus?
Is this “beginning” when the cosmos was created by God, or when it was “newly created” through the man Jesus?
“Mary cradled the Creator in her arms. ‘I never imagined God would look like that,’ she says to herself.”
Dr. Hurtado on his book God in New Testament Theology.
If the earliest Christians’ answer (re: how one can be a monotheist and yet worship both the one God and Jesus) was a good answer then, why isn’t it a good answer now?
Why did I write it? What does the book try to do? Who is it for?
Can a Christian sensibly say that Jesus is the Father incarnate?
God can’t be “perfect in love” unless he is multipersonal?
When I find something on YouTube which is actually helpful, I am pleasantly surprised, and feel the need to share it.
Arguing about what is essential to a trinitarian theology, and about a seemingly incoherent Trinity theory.
An apologist tries to tag unitarian Christians with some unwelcome words.