Help for James White on Identity
Sincere advice on how to move past a merely verbal defense of “the Trinity.”
Sincere advice on how to move past a merely verbal defense of “the Trinity.”
Is it the foundational commitment of biblical unitarians that Scripture must be inoffensive to human reason?
A prolific apologist embraces so-called “monarchical trinitarianism,” on which the one God just is the Father, not the Trinity.
You say you’ve looked into the biblical credentials of “the doctrine of the Trinity.” But have you actually read anything by unitarian Christians?
“I had come to this belief truly just through studying the Word.”
What does one do when the search for truth clashes with one’s need to fit in?
Did fourth century Christians come to a consensus about “the doctrine of the Trinity”?
Is there a plausible and biblical “doctrine of the Trinity”?
Is the question absurd? Or does it make sense in light of New Testament teachings?
“The straightforward meaning of the text is that the Son does not know the time of his return.”
A humorous puppet-show about a serious subject: properly understanding what the New Testament teaches about Jesus and God.
“…the doctrine of the Trinity is not in Scripture per se, but is the result of the Church’s interpretation of Scripture.”
“For all its complexity, the biblical doctrine of the Trinity can be stated in seven simple propositions.”
Which parts of Channing’s thought do and don’t hold up today?
‘How can I help it?’ he blubbered. ‘How can I help seeing what is in front of my eyes? Two and two are four.’
“And the Word was God.” Which one? The same mentioned before, or not?
Does the famous “Great Commission” passage at the end of Matthew teach that the one God is a Trinity?
“Mary cradled the Creator in her arms. ‘I never imagined God would look like that,’ she says to herself.”