Worship of Jesus, Worship of God, and the Fulfillment Fallacy
Notice how this scholar avoids what I call the fulfillment fallacy.
Quotes
Karl Rahner on the word “God” in the New Testament
A leading Roman Catholic scholar looks at the use of “God” in the New Testament.
Catholic Theologian Hans Küng on New Testament theology
“For the New Testament, as for the Hebrew Bible, the principle of unity is clearly the one God…”
“What, is the Son supposed to be an atheist?” – Part 1
Well, OF COURSE God incarnate will have the Father as his god.
Origen on the Challenge to Jesus is God Apologists
Would Origen agree with some present-day apologists who urge that Jesus and God are one and the same?
Dunn on Jesus as kyrios (“Lord”) in the New Testament
In calling Jesus “Lord,” is Paul asserting that Jesus is God himself?
Moses Stuart on Nicea
A trinitarian evangelical Bible scholar comments on the subordinationist theologies both of Arius and of his accusers.
Do Christians worship three Gods?
An evangelical author and blogger attempts a sort of primer on “the Trinity.”
apologist commits to actual Trinity theory, faceplants – Part 1
An apologist spells out “the Trinity” as incoherent monotheistic tritheism.
podcast 224 – Biblical Words for God and for his Son Part 1 – God and “God” in the Bible
Is Jesus referred to as “God” in the Bible, and if so, does this mean that Jesus is the one God himself?
podcast 219 – Thomas Reid on First Principles and Common Sense – Part 1
Are some truths really self-evident?
podcast 193 – Review of Sanders’s The Deep Things of God – Part 2
What, according to Dr. Sanders, is the crisis in contemporary trinitarian systematic theology, when it comes to the Bible?
Origen, Paul, and Peter: Christians worship the Jews’ god
An interesting little exchange between Origen and the pagan critic Celsus about the god of Christians.
What is essential to the gospel, according to Luke? Part 3
Peter and John address the Jewish leadership.
podcast 143 – Dr. Timothy Pawl’s In Defense of Conciliar Christology – Part 1
Is “conciliar christology” coherent?