podcast 370 – Dr. Steven Nemes’s formal challenge to Trinity theories
Exploring a new argument against any sort of catholic Trinity theory.
Exploring a new argument against any sort of catholic Trinity theory.
Evaluating three proposed reasons why God would be motivated to incarnate.
A deep dive on divine attributes, processions, and “social” trinitarianism.
What is “mere” social trinitarianism, and why is it controversial among trinitarian theologians?
Is it the foundational commitment of biblical unitarians that Scripture must be inoffensive to human reason?
You say you’ve looked into the biblical credentials of “the doctrine of the Trinity.” But have you actually read anything by unitarian Christians?
“I had come to this belief truly just through studying the Word.”
Did fourth century Christians come to a consensus about “the doctrine of the Trinity”?
Is there a plausible and biblical “doctrine of the Trinity”?
Is the “Granville Sharp Rule” + 2 Peter 1:1 and Titus 2:13 “fatal to unitarianism”?
A review of the most interesting trinities podcast episodes from 2021.
“For all its complexity, the biblical doctrine of the Trinity can be stated in seven simple propositions.”
Ten basic questions that need to be answered, and ten more advanced questions.
In the New Testament “God” is nearly always the Father. But what follows from that, exactly?
“I do not know what the Christians mean, and am as much puzzled as you; but Father Verbiest is of that opinion.”
I see trends in this analytic theology literature somewhat towards relative identity theories, and towards “metaphysical madness.”
Dr. Michael Bird argues that in Mark, Jesus is “included in the identity” of God.
Does the Gospel According to Mark contain as hidden messages the deity of Christ and the Trinity?
A Wesleyan ministry tells new Christians about “The Absolute Basics of the Christian Faith.”