podcast 245 – Response to Branson Part 3 – Dueling Definitions
Weighing incompatible definitions of trinitarian theology and unitarian theology.
Weighing incompatible definitions of trinitarian theology and unitarian theology.
Gregory of Nazianzus and John of Damascus held that the one God is the Trinity.
Was 381 the dawn of imperially enforced confession of a triune God?
Can one be a trinitarian without believing in a tripersonal God?
A leading Christian philosopher explains his “Social” Trinity theory.
A conversation about the New Testament on God, Jesus, and worship.
Rebutting a slanderous and careless “review” by a blogger.
Can these obvious truths pop the bubbles of various theological and christological speculations?
Is compatibilism about human freedom the key to defending Calvinism?
Have either of two philosophically astute bloggers refuted the Challenge to “Jesus is God” Apologists?
Is saying that the NT “includes Jesus in the divine identity” clearer than saying in the NT “Jesus is God”?
Is the idea of “divine identity” the key to understanding New Testament christology?
If only trinitarian scholars majored in consistent, intelligible, fully informed answers!
Which does the Bible teach, that the one God just is the Father, or that the one God is Father, Son, and Spirit?
“The Gospel is Trinitarian.” What does this mean, and is it both true and non-trivial?
How widely has God’s spirit been active in the world?