I’ve been commenting at Triablogue, in typical long-winded fashion, on posts by Steve Hays.
There’s some heat in addition to light, but it gets better as it goes on, and the inimitable James Anderson weighs in.
We discuss probably the favorite unitarian proof-text, John 17:3, as well as contradictions and methodological things.
Perhaps the most interesting point is Steve’s & James’s desire to somehow separate concern with consistency from exegesis. I think that isn’t, can’t, and ought not be done.
Check it out.
Update: some 4 posts so far. Have left lengthy comments.
Update: next to last installment.
Update: last.
Related posts:
podcast 51 – Dr. Ravi Zacharias on the Trinity
Copan answers: Who created God?
My diabolical "ruse" exposed - drat!
Richard of St. Victor 3 – Perfect charity must be directed at another person (JT)
podcast 60 – Dr. Carl Mosser on deification in the Bible
How much did Aristotle understand about numerical sameness (identity)?
new published paper: Craig's Contradictory Christ
The Maverick Philosopher: Are the divine persons parts of the triune God?
The Orthodox Formulas 1: The Council of Nicea (325)
podcast 162 - Dr. Timothy McGrew on the Convergence of Philosophy and Christianity
Pingback: trinities - What is the Trinity? A Dialogue with Steve Hays – Part 1 (Dale)
Comments are closed.