Brandon’s Siris blog has recently completed 6 years – it has surely outlived 99.9% of blogs, and is older than trinities, which is 4 this summer! Congrats, Brandon!
In a recent post Brandon takes issue with my recent appeal to the principle that “if every F is a G then there cannot be fewer Gs than Fs”.
Some Trinity theories are inconsistent with the (I think obviously true, self-evident) principle, notably the recent theory by Mike Rea, as well as the much-quoted “Athanasian” Creed. Brandon thinks I’m confused. I am confused, about how he thinks I’m confused. And probably about other things. 🙂
Check out our discussion in the comments following Brandon’s post. (Comment there if you’re interested.)
Related posts:
podcast 336 - Chris Date's Search for a Viable Trinity Theory - Part 1
podcast 347 - Novatian's On the Trinity – Part 1 – Almost Pope
Is Inspiring Philosophy's Michael Jones a subordinationist unitarian, or is he just confused?
10 steps towards getting less confused about the Trinity – #5 "Persons" - Part 1
too many Jesuses vs. too many "Jesuses"
from mysteries to atheism
Leftow 1: "Anti Social Trinitarianism"
Qureshi vs. Ally - Trinity vs. Tawhid
podcast 349 - Craig-Tuggy dialogue on trinitarian vs. unitarian theologies
podcast 371 - Dr. Steven Nemes on divine Christology in the New Testament
Pingback: trinities - SCORING THE BURKE – BOWMAN DEBATE – ROUND 6 Part 1 – BURKE (DALE)
Comments are closed.