Such as, “the question of whether there is one god or many (or none) as a version of the question of whether there is “one truth or many.”
Eh?
The Maverick Philosopher shines the bright sunlight of clarity on this whole mucky swamp of confusion:
The claim that truth is absolute, and cannot be relative to individuals or groups or historical epochs or races, or anything else, is a claim about the nature of truth. It is a claim about what truth is. One who insists on this obvious point is not laying claim to any absolute or god-like knowledge. I can know that truth is absolute without knowing which propositions are true. It is not polite to say it, but say it we must: the failure to grasp such a simple point is a mark of stupidity in someone like Caputo who has had plenty of time and opportunity to learn something about philosophy. He’s committing a rookie blunder, a sophomoric mistake. (emphases added)
