The Trinity Challenge, from a Sufi Muslim blog. The comments there are wild and wooly. There’s a charge of polytheism, and some non-trinitarian Christians weigh in.
The challenge, of course, cannot be met. But it seems to me he’s carelessly overlooking the options that the Trinity doctrine is:
(1) implicitly taught in the Bible (i.e. it is deducible from what is there, though not explicitly stated there),
or (2) that the doctrine is the best explanation of what is (explicitly and implicitly) taught there.
It’s sort of cheap to insist that either the doctrine is explicitly stated, or it ain’t in the Bible at all.
Compare: this poll here at trinities.
Related posts:
Craig: how Nicene orthodoxy rules out the full deity of Christ
a mini-course on atonement by Dr. Josh Thurow
Interview with Ray Faircloth, translator of the Kingdom of God Version of the New Testament
a conversation about the differences between God and Jesus
Nigel Warburton on contemporary philosophers
Linkage: Pruss on liberal theology (Dale)
Dialogue with the Maverick Philosopher: God is a being, not Being itself – part 7
Is Jesus God? @TheOfficerTatum vs. Whaddo You Meme??
Dr. Randal Rauser interviews Dr. Michael C. Rea on the Trinity
evangelical apologists take note: Hurtado on Jesus and God