podcast 200 – Kermit Zarley on Reformation – Part 1
Is reforming in light of scripture only acceptable in the distant past?
Is reforming in light of scripture only acceptable in the distant past?
What must I do, or what must I believe, to be saved?
What, according to Dr. Sanders, is the crisis in contemporary trinitarian systematic theology, when it comes to the Bible?
James Goetz and Corby Amos on the inconsistent triad about Jesus dying.
Marcellus’s theology is a key to understanding the post-Nicea controversies.
In the reign of Constantius II yet another council offered language to replace Nicea…
Why did Eusebius have to submit his own creed at the famous council of Nicea in 325?
In 344 a meeting of Eastern bishops sent a statement to the West explaining their theology.
What should we think of Athanasius’s ferocious condemnations of those he termed “Arians”?
In this episode we hear the rest (chapters 4-7) of On the Nicene Council (aka Defence of the Nicene Definition, De Decretis) by Athanasius of Alexandria.
With this episode we continue our series on the 4th-century creed-producing councils of catholic bishops.
How and why did American Unitarian Congregationalism die?
All Christians have always believed that Jesus Christ is one person with two natures, a divine nature and a human nature, right?
An appealing theological option which is neither Nicene nor “Arian”?
Is Jesus both mutable and immutable?
Plausibly, most Protestant scholars who think that the Bible teaches the Trinity focus on the New Testament. They argue that while trinitarianism isn’t explicit there, it is implicit.
Trinitarian theology is not served by sophistry, cheerleading, or ignoring relevant work. In this episode, I discuss five more apologetics face-plants about the Trinity.
According to recent research, about 3 in 10 Americans are evangelical Christians. But what exactly is an evangelical?