R.T. France on Mark 13:32
“Whatever later readers may have made of it, Jesus’ ‘confession of ignorance’ seems to pose no embarrassment or even surprise for Mark.”
“Whatever later readers may have made of it, Jesus’ ‘confession of ignorance’ seems to pose no embarrassment or even surprise for Mark.”
Opening statements and rebuttals.
The original meaning of John 1, disentangled from later speculations about Trinity and two natures christology.
What would we expect to find in the New Testament writings if the authors thought Jesus was a man, a god, or a godman?
“Incarnation” means initially that God’s love and power had been experienced in fullest measure in, through and as this man Jesus.
Dr. Mike Licona argues that the real, historical man Jesus considered himself to be God.
Dr. Beall explains and defends his suggestion that Christ is a contradiction.
In this episode Dr. Beall explains why he doesn’t accept five consistency-preserving ways to understand the divinity and humanity of Christ.
If God is essentially immortal, the answer must be: No. But the human Jesus of the Bible was then mortal.
Can one prove that the biblical Jesus is Yahweh based on his being savior or creator, or his being worshiped?
What sort of book is the gospel according to Mark, and what does it really claim about Jesus?
A Wesleyan ministry tells new Christians about “The Absolute Basics of the Christian Faith.”
I answer some questions and ask some, in response to this well done book review.
He said this to Jesus. But was he also addressing the God in Jesus?
“Dear Christian, I’ve been meaning to talk to you about God and me.”
Early modern unitarian Christian scholars offer a “Socinian” take on John 1.
Does John start his gospel at the same “beginning” as Mark 1:1?
If Jesus is referred to using the word “theos” (God) in the New Testament, does this imply that he is fully divine?