podcast 261 – How to Argue that the Bible is Trinitarian – Response to Bowman
Arguing about what is essential to a trinitarian theology, and about a seemingly incoherent Trinity theory.
Arguing about what is essential to a trinitarian theology, and about a seemingly incoherent Trinity theory.
An apologist tries to tag unitarian Christians with some unwelcome words.
Want to debate (or just refute) me? Here are some things you should study.
This man’s journey reflects and reveals some problems with present-day evangelical teaching.
“What bothers me most is the rhetorical move you’re making with this claim that everyone before Nicea (or so) was a ‘Unitarian.'”
An evangelical author and blogger attempts a sort of primer on “the Trinity.”
Deciding to call just one of the three selves in your christology “Jesus” doesn’t fix the fact that your theory has two too many selves.
An apologist spells out “the Trinity” as incoherent monotheistic tritheism.
Real arguments vs. pointed questions combined with incredulous tone.
Synopsis: I’m not Eastern Orthodox, so am incompetent to discuss the Trinity, and I’m somehow missing the whole point.
Can we justify a distinction between the ‘is’ of identity and the ‘is’ of predication
In this episode I respond to the interesting article “What about This View? How to Defend an Anti-Trinitarian Theology,” by evangelical apologist Dr. Robert M. Bowman Jr.
What if the official god of your theology isn’t the one who actually gets his way in your life?