podcast 182 – White’s case for the Trinity – Part 2
Dr. White vs. John on the thesis of the 4th gospel.
Protestant
podcast 181 – White’s case for the Trinity – Part 1
Is this a powerful, state-of-the-art biblical argument for the Trinity?
podcast 180 – Apologists on how God can die – Part 3
Dealing with this inconsistent triad can be hard!
podcast 179 – Apologists on how God can die – Part 2
Can someone with two natures be essentially immortal and die?
podcast 178 – Apologists on how God can die – Part 1
Can evangelical apologists answer the question “How can God die?”
podcast 168 – The Death of Unitarian Congregationalism
How and why did American Unitarian Congregationalism die?
podcast 166 – Alvan Lamson’s On the Doctrine of Two Natures in Jesus Christ – Part 2
Is the theory that Jesus has “two natures” more trouble than it’s worth?
podcast 165 – Alvan Lamson’s On the Doctrine of Two Natures in Jesus Christ – Part 1
All Christians have always believed that Jesus Christ is one person with two natures, a divine nature and a human nature, right?
podcast 163 – Dr. K. Scott Oliphint on How Christianity Trumps Philosophy
Does Christianity trump Philosophy?
podcast 158 – Listener Questions 3
An appealing theological option which is neither Nicene nor “Arian”?
podcast 155 – Dr. J.R. Daniel Kirk on A Man Attested by God – Part 1
Do Matthew, Mark, and Luke discreetly but clearly imply that Jesus is God?
the apologetics blind-spot on numerical identity
Here’s part of a conversation I had recently with a guy in a Facebook group who when it comes to theology consumes almost only evangelical apologetics sources. I’m going to call him “Tim” here. The conversation illustrates a blind spot that I often run into, a blind spot which results from people who study apologetics being insufficiently trained in logic. All the non-theological points I… Read More »the apologetics blind-spot on numerical identity
podcast 145 – ‘Tis Mystery All: the Immortal dies!
God is immortal. But Jesus died. Does it follow that Jesus is not God?
podcast 143 – Dr. Timothy Pawl’s In Defense of Conciliar Christology – Part 1
Is “conciliar christology” coherent?