Hurtado on the early worship of Jesus
“…earliest believers treated the risen/exalted Jesus as they did only because they felt required to do so by God.”
“…earliest believers treated the risen/exalted Jesus as they did only because they felt required to do so by God.”
If the earliest Christians’ answer (re: how one can be a monotheist and yet worship both the one God and Jesus) was a good answer then, why isn’t it a good answer now?
He argues cogently that even in the earliest parts of the New Testament, the religious worship of Jesus is presupposed, such as in Philippians 2.
Jesus is God, and God can’t be tempted… yet Jesus was tempted?
“Ok, I’ve finished watching your presentation, and below is my careful critique of it. … Enjoy.”
Can we simply observe the triune God in the descriptions of Jesus’s baptism?
Doubtful speculation irresponsibly presented as straightforward New Testament doctrine.
Who needs the Bible when you can gesture at some philosophical speculations?
An important post by the Golf Pro from the Moon. He answers the above question, in part: Yes…
Notice how this scholar avoids what I call the fulfillment fallacy.
Biblically “proving” that David and Jesus are one and the same.
Using fulfillment fallacy reasoning to “prove” that King David is God.
Do Genesis 48, 1 Samuel 3, and Jeremiah 1 refute biblical unitarian views on God and Jesus?
Since the beginning, Christians in one God who is one perfect self, the Father.