Hays denies that Jesus died
The gospel commits us to more than: “Jesus died” is (somehow or other) true.
Some more replies to the triad
James Goetz and Corby Amos on the inconsistent triad about Jesus dying.
Christ didn’t die, but only experienced another’s death?
Did Jesus only experience the death of another, without dying?
Hays on “God” in the New Testament
One’s theology can lead one to deny obvious facts about the New Testament.
podcast 181 – White’s case for the Trinity – Part 1
Is this a powerful, state-of-the-art biblical argument for the Trinity?
Hays: another try on how an essentially immortal being can die
He tries his hand at a little ad hoc philosophizing about death.
podcast 180 – Apologists on how God can die – Part 3
Dealing with this inconsistent triad can be hard!
podcast 179 – Apologists on how God can die – Part 2
Can someone with two natures be essentially immortal and die?
podcast 178 – Apologists on how God can die – Part 1
Can evangelical apologists answer the question “How can God die?”
podcast 176 – Photinus of Sirmium
His views seem to have been those of present-day biblical unitarians.
Pawl’s Promise
“I will host a bonfire at which I and any of you who feel inclined can come and burn our copies of this book.”
podcast 175 – Marcellus of Ancyra
Marcellus’s theology is a key to understanding the post-Nicea controversies.
10 Practical Tips for becoming a Worse Apologist
Steve Hays provides a stellar example of how not to do apologetics.
“Identifying Jesus as Yahweh” as heresy
McLatchie’s mistake about historical, mainstream Christian theologies.
podcast 174 – The First Sirmian creed (351)
In the reign of Constantius II yet another council offered language to replace Nicea…
podcast 173 – Eusebius of Caesarea
Why did Eusebius have to submit his own creed at the famous council of Nicea in 325?
podcast 172 – The Creed of the Long Lines (344)
In 344 a meeting of Eastern bishops sent a statement to the West explaining their theology.
podcast 171 – Assessing Athanasius and his Arguments
What should we think of Athanasius’s ferocious condemnations of those he termed “Arians”?
Is every Orwell an Orwell?
Can we justify a distinction between the ‘is’ of identity and the ‘is’ of predication