podcast 363 – Dr. Andrew Hollingsworth on “mere” social trinitarianism and eternal relations of origin – Part 2
A deep dive on divine attributes, processions, and “social” trinitarianism.
A deep dive on divine attributes, processions, and “social” trinitarianism.
What is “mere” social trinitarianism, and why is it controversial among trinitarian theologians?
Is it the foundational commitment of biblical unitarians that Scripture must be inoffensive to human reason?
Former Episcopalian G.W. Hyer on the confused mind of the trinitarian layperson.
Does Inspiring Philosophy’s Michael Jones have a Trinity theory?
A prolific apologist embraces so-called “monarchical trinitarianism,” on which the one God just is the Father, not the Trinity.
Dialogue with an apologist about changes of tritheism and “the doctrine of the Trinity.”
A thoughtful Baptist confronts his church about biblical vs. later teachings about God, Jesus, and heresy.
Andrew DeFord undertakes a refutation of the main argument of podcast 248.
You say you’ve looked into the biblical credentials of “the doctrine of the Trinity.” But have you actually read anything by unitarian Christians?
“I had come to this belief truly just through studying the Word.”
What does one do when the search for truth clashes with one’s need to fit in?
Did fourth century Christians come to a consensus about “the doctrine of the Trinity”?
Is there a plausible and biblical “doctrine of the Trinity”?
Is the question absurd? Or does it make sense in light of New Testament teachings?
Can a historian conclude that Jesus thought he was God?
An ordinary believer with ordinary reading comprehension can see that “Sharp’s Rule” recommends misinterpretations.