{"id":1463,"date":"2010-04-08T05:40:29","date_gmt":"2010-04-08T09:40:29","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/trinities.org\/blog\/?p=1463"},"modified":"2015-03-06T16:03:54","modified_gmt":"2015-03-06T21:03:54","slug":"richard-of-st-victors-de-trinitate-ch-23","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/trinities.org\/blog\/richard-of-st-victors-de-trinitate-ch-23\/","title":{"rendered":"Richard of St. Victor\u2019s De Trinitate, Ch. 23"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Now, to resume our drawn out and often-stalled <a title=\"Series posts so far\" href=\"http:\/\/trinities.org\/blog\/?s=Richard+of+St.+Victor\" target=\"_blank\">series on Richard of St. Victor<\/a>, in which we blog through th<img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignright size-full wp-image-1462\" title=\"three golden statues\" src=\"http:\/\/trinities.org\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/three-golden-statues.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"300\" height=\"300\" srcset=\"https:\/\/trinities.org\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/three-golden-statues.jpg 300w, https:\/\/trinities.org\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/three-golden-statues-150x150.jpg 150w, https:\/\/trinities.org\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/three-golden-statues-90x90.jpg 90w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px\" \/>e entirety of book III of his<em> De Trinitate<\/em> (<em>On the Trinity<\/em>), in which he famously \/ notoriously argues for the Trinity from reason alone. These chapters, like many preceding ones, are too compressed, so I&#8217;ll try to unpack them for us.<\/p>\n<p>In chapter 23, Richard says that between the members of the Trinity &#8220;there seems to be more identity [sameness] than equality.&#8221; (p. 395) He then cites as an example <strong>three indistinguishable golden statues<\/strong>. Because they&#8217;re indistinguishable, we say they are &#8220;equal&#8221;. But there are three masses of gold involved, and so there are really three things here, three statues. But the case of the Trinity is different, he urges. How? Because &#8220;whatever is in any one person of the Trinity, the smae is also completely in any other person.&#8221; Here, he implies, we do have a deeper kind of &#8220;identity&#8221; or &#8220;sameness&#8221;.<\/p>\n<p>I take it that Richard&#8217;s point is that the three Persons of the Trinity don&#8217;t differ as far as their composition, because each contains one and the same divine nature, here thought of as a particular.<\/p>\n<p>He then brings up a case of <strong>&#8220;three rational spirits&#8221;<\/strong>, three souls. <!--more-->Though they may be equal, in that each is powerful and wise in the same way and to the same degree, they are in the end both three persons and &#8220;three substances&#8221;. His implied point, I assume, is that <strong>each has his own nature<\/strong> as a component &#8211; such as humanity, or maybe rational soulhood . Three natures, ergo three &#8220;substances&#8221; &#8211; I take it, there things, three concrete individuals.<\/p>\n<p>Continuing to read into him, he means to contrast both of the cases with the Trinity in this way. Because the Three share one divinity, one divine nature as a component (share one &#8220;substance&#8221; in the sense of essence or nature), they are therefore, even though three persons, one substance, that is, one concrete individual, specifically one god.<\/p>\n<p>Of course, the Persons will also be &#8220;equal&#8221;, for the same reason (sharing one token divine nature) &#8211; he makes this point at the very end of chapter 23.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Now, to resume our drawn out and often-stalled series on Richard of St. Victor, in which we blog through the entirety of book III of his De Trinitate (On the Trinity), in which he famously \/ notoriously argues for the Trinity from reason alone. These chapters, like many preceding ones, are too compressed, so I&#8217;ll&hellip;&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/trinities.org\/blog\/richard-of-st-victors-de-trinitate-ch-23\/\" rel=\"bookmark\">Read More &raquo;<span class=\"screen-reader-text\">Richard of St. Victor\u2019s De Trinitate, Ch. 23<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":1462,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[14,10,38,9],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1463","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-history","category-logic","category-monotheism","category-philosophy"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/trinities.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1463","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/trinities.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/trinities.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/trinities.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/trinities.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1463"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/trinities.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1463\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":34985,"href":"https:\/\/trinities.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1463\/revisions\/34985"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/trinities.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/1462"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/trinities.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1463"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/trinities.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1463"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/trinities.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1463"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}