{"id":2572,"date":"2011-04-07T00:44:43","date_gmt":"2011-04-07T04:44:43","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/trinities.org\/blog\/?p=2572"},"modified":"2017-03-10T15:54:19","modified_gmt":"2017-03-10T20:54:19","slug":"warning-to-new-christians","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/trinities.org\/blog\/warning-to-new-christians\/","title":{"rendered":"Warning to New Christians"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignleft size-full wp-image-2573\" title=\"misinformation\" src=\"http:\/\/trinities.org\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/misinformation.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"300\" height=\"300\" srcset=\"https:\/\/trinities.org\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/misinformation.jpg 300w, https:\/\/trinities.org\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/misinformation-150x150.jpg 150w, https:\/\/trinities.org\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/misinformation-90x90.jpg 90w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px\" \/>Over at <a title=\"Parchment and Pen blog\" href=\"http:\/\/www.reclaimingthemind.org\/blog\/\" target=\"_blank\">Parchment and Pen<\/a> Michael Patton has posted a <strong><a title=\"Post on the Trinity\" href=\"http:\/\/www.reclaimingthemind.org\/blog\/2011\/04\/the-discipleship-book-trinity\/\" target=\"_blank\">chapter on the Trinty<\/a><\/strong>, part of a forthcoming book called <em>The Discipleship Book<\/em>, intended <strong>to instruct new Christians<\/strong>.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Dear new Christians &#8211; beware<\/strong>. Patton is sincere, but misinformed. He thinks the Bible obviously teaches what he&#8217;s asserting, and reasons that any prior Bible-loving Christians must&#8217;ve thought likewise.<\/p>\n<p>But having studied a vast amount of historical writings by Christians, I can assure you that this is <strong>demonstrably not so<\/strong>, even if we stick to &#8220;mainstream&#8221; Christians (so ignoring, e.g. &#8220;Arians&#8221;, Marcionites, etc.) I take no pleasure in pointing this out, and I wish it were as simple as Patton says. But facts are facts.<\/p>\n<p><strong>I&#8217;ve discussed his sort of take on the Trinty <a title=\"Negative Mysterians at Word in Dallas post\" href=\"http:\/\/trinities.org\/blog\/archives\/1246\" target=\"_blank\">before<\/a><\/strong>. It is not, as Patton says in a comment, &#8220;what the Bible teaches and Christians for 2000 years have believed.&#8221; It is what (some? many?) theologians at <a title=\"seminary website\" href=\"http:\/\/www.dts.edu\/\" target=\"_blank\">Dallas Theological Seminary<\/a> think about the Trinity. How widespread these views are, I&#8217;m not sure. But the many evangelical and other theologians riding the <a title=\"Social Trinitarianism explained\" href=\"http:\/\/plato.stanford.edu\/entries\/trinity\/#SocTri\" target=\"_blank\">&#8220;social trinitarian&#8221; bandwagon<\/a> <strong>would <em>not <\/em>agree<\/strong> with what Patton says.<\/p>\n<p>Regarding what Patton holds forth as &#8220;the best we can do&#8221;, take care lest you <a title=\"Shield of Faith post\" href=\"http:\/\/trinities.org\/blog\/archives\/15\" target=\"_blank\">fall into inconsistency<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>You should know that some of the most brilliant Christian thinkers in the last 100 years have held <strong>many <a title=\"Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, &quot;Trinity&quot;\" href=\"http:\/\/plato.stanford.edu\/entries\/trinity\/\" target=\"_blank\">different views<\/a> <\/strong>on just how &#8220;the&#8221; doctrine should be understood. Unfortunately, these theories are, for the most part, not consistent with one another.<\/p>\n<p>Patton asserts that<!--more--><\/p>\n<blockquote><p>The doctrine of the Trinity has been held by all orthodox Christians throughout all of church history<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>This is either trivial or false.<\/p>\n<p>If by &#8220;orthodox&#8221; we mean, ones accepting the &#8220;ecumenical creeds&#8221;, and &#8220;the doctrine&#8221; here is what those creeds say, then it is true by definition, and also trivial.<\/p>\n<p>But whatever &#8220;the doctrine&#8221; is thought to be, if\u00a0 &#8220;orthodox&#8221; here means all mainstream Christians (proto-orthodox\/catholic, Catholic, Eastern Orthodox, Protestant, anabaptist, pentecostal), then it is false. He&#8217;d like to think that only spoil-your-Saturday-morning-by-knocking-on-your-door cults have opted out, but this is not so. Some mainstream Christians have basically ignored creedal Trinity claims. Others deny them, on the grounds that the Bible doesn&#8217;t really teach them. Others never heard of them, and literally never thought about them. Other emphasize them, but interpret them in various ways.<\/p>\n<p><strong>But don&#8217;t take my word for it!<\/strong> I&#8217;m just some <a title=\"my home page\" href=\"http:\/\/trinities.org\/dale\/\" target=\"_blank\">random guy<\/a> you found on deh internets, right?<\/p>\n<p><strong>Pick up any catholic (proto-orthodox, mainstream Christian) theologian from c. 150-200 CE. <\/strong>You could start with Justin Martyr. You can read all we have from him in maybe a week. Is he selling what Patton is selling? Or take Irenaeus, Athanagoras, Origin, Tertullian. (Hint: review what Patton says about &#8220;subordinationism&#8221;.)<\/p>\n<p>Too hard? No problem. Read<a title=\"Alvan Lamson book\" href=\"http:\/\/www.amazon.com\/church-first-three-centuries-formation\/dp\/1425546390\" target=\"_blank\"> this guy<\/a>; he shows in great detail what these folk were up to, and why it is a mistake to count them as trinitarians. It&#8217;s a good read.<\/p>\n<p>Don&#8217;t trust him, because he&#8217;s a unitarian?<img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"size-full wp-image-2575 alignright\" style=\"border: 10px solid white;\" title=\"used car kitty\" src=\"http:\/\/trinities.org\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/used-car-kitty.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"500\" height=\"375\" srcset=\"https:\/\/trinities.org\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/used-car-kitty.jpg 500w, https:\/\/trinities.org\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/used-car-kitty-300x225.jpg 300w, https:\/\/trinities.org\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/used-car-kitty-420x315.jpg 420w, https:\/\/trinities.org\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/used-car-kitty-460x345.jpg 460w, https:\/\/trinities.org\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/used-car-kitty-90x68.jpg 90w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 500px) 100vw, 500px\" \/><\/p>\n<p>Fine. Then, read <a title=\"Olson's History of Christian Theology\" href=\"http:\/\/www.amazon.com\/Story-Christian-Theology-Centuries-Tradition\/dp\/0830815058\/ref=sr_1_3?ie=UTF8&amp;qid=1302147376&amp;sr=8-3\" target=\"_blank\">Roger Olson<\/a>, a respected and fairly <strong>mainstream evangelical theologian<\/strong>, on Justin Martyr, et. al. Do they teach thee co-equal divine persons within one God? You be the judge. Don&#8217;t just trust any cool cat you come across.<\/p>\n<p><strong>About divine attributes<\/strong>: reading Patton&#8217;s chapter, you&#8217;d never guess that many generations of theologians firmly believed a <strong>doctrine of <a title=\"Divine Simplicity, Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy\" href=\"http:\/\/plato.stanford.edu\/entries\/divine-simplicity\/\" target=\"_blank\">divine simplicity<\/a><\/strong>, according to which (roughly) God is utterly simple (without parts or components), doesn&#8217;t have any non-essential attributes, and it&#8217;s a mistake to think that God has <em>multiple <\/em>intrinsic attributes at all. (Yes &#8211; these are dark sayings, and many Christian philosophers, including me, deny them. But others <a title=\"Jeff Brower home page\" href=\"http:\/\/web.ics.purdue.edu\/~brower\/research.htm\" target=\"_blank\">defend them<\/a>.)<\/p>\n<p>Actually, Patton&#8217;s whole list of &#8220;non-essential&#8221; attributes is idiosyncratic. Does he hold it possible for God to be non-gracious, non-loving, not a Trinity? Normally in philosophy nowadays, a non-essential attribute is one which a thing could possibly exist without. In ancient times, the idea was more that a non-essential attribute wasn&#8217;t a defining one (though <em>some <\/em>were such that you couldn&#8217;t be without them). But in ancient and medieval times, as I said, God was thought to be utterly simple (partless and without any internal multiplicity). Yes, it&#8217;s a mystery how anyone thought this was compatible with thinking of God as tri-personal.<\/p>\n<p><strong>If you&#8217;re a new Christian &#8211; great!<\/strong> You should love God with all you&#8217;ve got, and follow Christ in all things. There&#8217;s no other way to live. About the Trinity, I don&#8217;t have any <em>simple <\/em>answers for you. Patton is certainly right in holding that we must all follow as best we can, knowing that there&#8217;s a lot we don&#8217;t know, and that there are countless truths about God which we&#8217;ll never know. Part of loving God is devoting your mental energies long term to carefully thinking through these things when you can, as best you can. Keep going!<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Over at Parchment and Pen Michael Patton has posted a chapter on the Trinty, part of a forthcoming book called The Discipleship Book, intended to instruct new Christians. Dear new Christians &#8211; beware. Patton is sincere, but misinformed. He thinks the Bible obviously teaches what he&#8217;s asserting, and reasons that any prior Bible-loving Christians must&#8217;ve&hellip;&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/trinities.org\/blog\/warning-to-new-christians\/\" rel=\"bookmark\">Read More &raquo;<span class=\"screen-reader-text\">Warning to New Christians<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":2575,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[37,21,6,4,8,20,9,3],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-2572","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-apologetics","category-bible","category-complaints","category-heresy-orthodoxy","category-linkage","category-mystery","category-philosophy","category-theories"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/trinities.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2572","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/trinities.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/trinities.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/trinities.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/trinities.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2572"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"https:\/\/trinities.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2572\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":38674,"href":"https:\/\/trinities.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2572\/revisions\/38674"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/trinities.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/2575"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/trinities.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2572"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/trinities.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2572"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/trinities.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2572"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}