{"id":3767,"date":"2012-04-24T13:05:14","date_gmt":"2012-04-24T17:05:14","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/trinities.org\/blog\/?p=3767"},"modified":"2015-08-05T13:26:02","modified_gmt":"2015-08-05T17:26:02","slug":"defining-the-concept-of-a-christian-unitarian","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/trinities.org\/blog\/defining-the-concept-of-a-christian-unitarian\/","title":{"rendered":"Defining the concept of a Christian unitarian"},"content":{"rendered":"<figure style=\"width: 400px\" class=\"wp-caption alignright\"><a href=\"http:\/\/wordsimagined.blogspot.com\/2009\/04\/succeed-or-try-again.html\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" style=\"border-image: initial; border: 9px solid white;\" src=\"http:\/\/4.bp.blogspot.com\/_4SgIEbZq7mk\/SeonoIELqQI\/AAAAAAAAAUU\/iQWKSWvY4nM\/s400\/Succeed+or+Try+Again.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"400\" height=\"216\" \/><\/a><figcaption class=\"wp-caption-text\">(click for image credit)<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p>Thanks to reader Mike Gant \u00a0for his question about <a href=\"http:\/\/trinities.org\/blog\/defining-the-concept-of-a-unitarian\/\" target=\"_blank\">my last post.<\/a><\/p>\n<p>As of now I <em>think<\/em> I&#8217;ve got a solid <strong>definition of the concept <em>unitarian<\/em><\/strong>:\u00a0someone who believes that the one God just is (i.e. is numerically identical to) a certain self and not to any other self.<\/p>\n<p>But I then tried to define the<strong> more specific concept of a Christian unitarian<\/strong>:\u00a0someone who believes that the one God just is (i.e. is numerically identical to) a certain self, namely the Father, and not to any other self.<\/p>\n<p>But this is <em>not<\/em> a good definition. Mike asked: what about ancient friends of God like Moses and Abraham?<\/p>\n<p>D&#8217;oh! The above definition makes them <em>Christian<\/em> unitarians. Thus, it is<strong> too &#8220;broad&#8221; or &#8220;wide.&#8221;<\/strong><br \/>\nMy intent was to distinguish, say, a native American or Hindu unitarian from a Christian unitarian. The definition I offer above does that, but it doesn&#8217;t exclude Jews who either (1) never heard of Christianity or (2) disavow Christianity from being &#8220;Christian&#8221; unitarians.<\/p>\n<p>To<strong> try again<\/strong> then: I think what I offered was a definition of the concept of <strong>an <em>Abrahamic<\/em> unitarian<\/strong>. Again:\u00a0someone who believes that the one God just is (i.e. is numerically identical to) a certain self, namely the Father, and not to any other self. This formula uses a Jesus-specific term (&#8220;the Father&#8221;) but I think an equivalent definition could be given using any name or title that refers to the same being that &#8220;the Father&#8221; does in Jesus&#8217; usage. So an equivalent definition would be:\u00a0someone who believes that the one God just is (i.e. is numerically identical to) a certain self, namely YHWH, and not to any other self.<\/p>\n<p>Christian unitarians, of course, are also Abrahamic unitarians. And so are Jews &#8211; at least, Jews who think God to be a great self, and not a force, an ineffable mystery, or a who-knows-what. The main concepts I&#8217;m talking about would be related like this:<\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"size-medium wp-image-3768 alignleft\" title=\"Christianunitarians\" src=\"http:\/\/trinities.org\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/Christianunitarians-300x286.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"300\" height=\"286\" \/><\/p>\n<p>So far, so good. What then, must be added to the concept of an Abrahamic unitarian to get the more specific concept of a Christian unitarian?<\/p>\n<p>Here&#8217;s a New Testament inspired suggestion: the characteristic or defining thesis of a Christian is believing that Jesus is God&#8217;s messiah, the anointed one, the Christ. Thus,<strong> a unitarian Christian would be defined as<\/strong> an Abrahamic unitarian who accepts the this one true God&#8217;s Messiah is the man Jesus.<\/p>\n<p>One may worry that this is still too wide. <strong>Does it count Muslims<\/strong> as &#8220;Christian unitarians&#8221;? One might think so &#8211; they claim that Allah (the God) is none other than the one worshiped by Abraham. And the Qur&#8217;an says ten times that Jesus is <em>al-masih<\/em>, &#8220;the messiah.&#8221; (See van Gorder&#8217;s <em><a title=\"No God but God on Amazon\" href=\"http:\/\/www.amazon.com\/No-God-But-Muslim-Christian-Dialogue\/dp\/1570754640\" target=\"_blank\">No God but God<\/a><\/em>, pp. 131-4)<\/p>\n<p>But I think the definition is <em>not<\/em> too wide, for the reason that all Muslims reject the claim that Jesus is God&#8217;s messiah<em> as Christians understand that<\/em>, as &#8220;the Lamb of God who takes away the sins of the world&#8221; and who even now serves as an intermediary between God and humankind. Also, to accept him as God&#8217;s deliverer is to accept his leadership over you, to take Jesus as your Lord, your boss. No Muslim does that; for all the compliments they pay Jesus, they live their lives by the Hadith, the Qur&#8217;an, and the traditional interpretations of these.<\/p>\n<p>Does it allow Jehovahs Witnesses? I think so. Mormons? Possibly &#8211; not unless they are monotheists; one must be that to be any sort of unitarian.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Any counterexamples<\/strong> to this definition?<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Thanks to reader Mike Gant \u00a0for his question about my last post. As of now I think I&#8217;ve got a solid definition of the concept unitarian:\u00a0someone who believes that the one God just is (i.e. is numerically identical to) a certain self and not to any other self. But I then tried to define the&hellip;&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/trinities.org\/blog\/defining-the-concept-of-a-christian-unitarian\/\" rel=\"bookmark\">Read More &raquo;<span class=\"screen-reader-text\">Defining the concept of a Christian unitarian<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":3768,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[4,10,38,9,43],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-3767","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-heresy-orthodoxy","category-logic","category-monotheism","category-philosophy","category-unitarianism"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/trinities.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3767","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/trinities.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/trinities.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/trinities.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/trinities.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3767"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/trinities.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3767\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":35937,"href":"https:\/\/trinities.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3767\/revisions\/35937"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/trinities.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/3768"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/trinities.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3767"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/trinities.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=3767"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/trinities.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=3767"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}