{"id":44636,"date":"2024-03-24T09:19:10","date_gmt":"2024-03-24T14:19:10","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/trinities.org\/blog\/?p=44636"},"modified":"2024-03-24T09:19:14","modified_gmt":"2024-03-24T14:19:14","slug":"smith-on-whites-jesus-is-yahweh-arguments-restitutio-540","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/trinities.org\/blog\/smith-on-whites-jesus-is-yahweh-arguments-restitutio-540\/","title":{"rendered":"Smith on White’s Jesus is Yahweh arguments: Restitutio 540"},"content":{"rendered":"\n

In this episode of the Restitutio Podcast<\/a>, pastor Sean Finnegan interviews New Testament scholar and host of The Biblical Unitarian Podcast<\/a> Dr. Dustin Smith<\/strong> about my recent debate, focusing on White’s arguments that “Jesus is Yahweh.” In my mind this was a “deity of Christ” debate, not a trinitarian-unitarian debate<\/strong>. But Finnegan and Smith treat it more as the latter, and make a lot of interesting points. Dr. Smith gives his own, different take on the passages White appealed to. About Smith’s reading of Hebrews 1:10-12 (see also here<\/a>), this is the general sort of reading I mentioned in the cross-examination when White asked me if it would refute my position that Jesus is not Yahweh if Hebrews 1:10-12 were (only) about the Son. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n