{"id":4912,"date":"2013-09-06T09:46:46","date_gmt":"2013-09-06T13:46:46","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/trinities.org\/blog\/?p=4912"},"modified":"2013-11-19T21:53:10","modified_gmt":"2013-11-20T02:53:10","slug":"the-maverick-philosopher-are-the-divine-persons-parts-of-the-triune-god","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/trinities.org\/blog\/the-maverick-philosopher-are-the-divine-persons-parts-of-the-triune-god\/","title":{"rendered":"The Maverick Philosopher: Are the divine persons parts of the triune God?"},"content":{"rendered":"<figure style=\"width: 300px\" class=\"wp-caption alignright\"><a title=\"Meaw Meaw\" href=\"http:\/\/www.flickr.com\/photos\/31191642@N05\/3932052676\/\" target=\"_blank\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\" \" style=\"border: 11px solid white;\" title=\"Meaw Meaw\" alt=\"Meaw Meaw - by  Sergiu Bacioiu via Compfight\" src=\"http:\/\/farm4.staticflickr.com\/3456\/3932052676_491d8956de.jpg\" width=\"300\" height=\"178\" \/><\/a><figcaption class=\"wp-caption-text\">(click for source)<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p><small> <\/small>I missed an excellent post by our friend the Maverick Philosopher back in January:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>&#8230;if the proper parts of a cat can be feline in the very same sense\u00a0in which\u00a0the cat is feline, without themselves being cats, then we have an analogy that renders intelligible the claim that the Persons of the Trinity are divine without being Gods.\u00a0 <strong>The picture is this<\/strong>:\u00a0 God or the Godhead or the Trinity is a whole the proper parts of which are exactly the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit.\u00a0 The Persons are distinct among themselves, but each is divine in virtue of being a proper part of God.\u00a0 There is one God in three divine Persons.\u00a0 The mereological model allows us to avoid tritheism and to affirm that God is one and three without contradiction.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Bill doesn&#8217;t think it works&#8230; <a title=\"Maverick Philosopher on merelogical Trinity theories\" href=\"http:\/\/maverickphilosopher.typepad.com\/maverick_philosopher\/2013\/01\/is-the-skeleton-of-a-cat-feline-in-the-same-sense-a-feline-is.html\" target=\"_blank\"><strong>read on<\/strong>. <\/a>Don&#8217;t forget that the Maverick often <a title=\"Trinity posts at the Maverick Philosopher\" href=\"http:\/\/maverickphilosopher.typepad.com\/.services\/blog\/6a010535ce1cf6970c010535c82845970b\/search?filter.q=Trinity\" target=\"_blank\">philosophizes about the Trinity<\/a>. And the Maverick is always worth hearing out.<\/p>\n<p>Here&#8217;s <a title=\"more on &quot;feline&quot;\" href=\"http:\/\/trinities.org\/blog\/archives\/104\" target=\"_blank\">an old trinities post<\/a> on what Bill&#8217;s talking about above &#8211; the rational reconstruction of Trinity formulas by Moreland and Craig.<\/p>\n<p>We could add that if one wants to be a <strong><em>classical<\/em> trinitarian<\/strong>, as some but by no means all trinitarians want to be, then one must reject this approach. The ancient version of trinitarian affirms divine simplicity &#8211; that in God there are no multiple anythings, including any parts. Bill has an <a title=\"&quot;Divine Simplicity&quot; at SEP\" href=\"http:\/\/plato.stanford.edu\/entries\/divine-simplicity\/\" target=\"_blank\">excellent free piece<\/a> on that too.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>I missed an excellent post by our friend the Maverick Philosopher back in January: &#8230;if the proper parts of a cat can be feline in the very same sense\u00a0in which\u00a0the cat is feline, without themselves being cats, then we have an analogy that renders intelligible the claim that the Persons of the Trinity are divine&hellip;&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/trinities.org\/blog\/the-maverick-philosopher-are-the-divine-persons-parts-of-the-triune-god\/\" rel=\"bookmark\">Read More &raquo;<span class=\"screen-reader-text\">The Maverick Philosopher: Are the divine persons parts of the triune God?<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":5202,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[8,9,3],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-4912","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-linkage","category-philosophy","category-theories"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/trinities.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4912","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/trinities.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/trinities.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/trinities.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/trinities.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=4912"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/trinities.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4912\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":4918,"href":"https:\/\/trinities.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4912\/revisions\/4918"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/trinities.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/5202"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/trinities.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=4912"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/trinities.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=4912"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/trinities.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=4912"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}