{"id":88,"date":"2007-05-23T18:45:51","date_gmt":"2007-05-23T18:45:51","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/trinities.org\/blog\/archives\/88"},"modified":"2007-06-09T02:51:14","modified_gmt":"2007-06-09T02:51:14","slug":"books","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/trinities.org\/blog\/books\/","title":{"rendered":"Books"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Sometimes, all your main interests converge. Books? Check. Computers? Check. Philosophy and theology? Check. History? Check. The result: <strong><a href=\"http:\/\/stores.lulu.com\/store.php?fAcctID=900744\" title=\"trinities.org books\">http:\/\/trinities.org\/books<\/a><\/strong>.<!--more--><\/p>\n<p>Some of your know that I work on &#8220;early modern&#8221; (roughly 1650-1800) philosophy, especially philosophy of religion. For some time now, I&#8217;ve been reading through some of the many debates in that era regarding the Trinity.<strong> The debates are  more wide-ranging and hard-hitting than anything academic theologians are doing now<\/strong>, and bizarrely, they&#8217;ve been forgotten by nearly everyone but a few historians. There are interesting historical and institutional reasons for this lapse of collective memory, but that&#8217;s an issue for another post (or five). In particular, it seems that most theologians and philosophers now writing on the Trinity are simply unfamiliar with this stuff. That&#8217;s a shame, as <strong>much can be learned<\/strong> from it, and moreover, in many cases recent-day people (including me) are just re-hashing points well-made back in 1692 or 1738 (or whenever).<\/p>\n<p>Well, now you can read some of it &#8211; cheaply.<strong> These are real paperbacks<\/strong>, reprints of 17th, 18th, or 19th century editions. The covers are a little thin for my taste, but the pages and binding are quite nice. Print quality varies widely. For some reason, the online Previews always under-represent the print-quality. Beware that they print these to order &#8211; no stocks are kept, so they won&#8217;t accept returns. I could have these listed on Amazon, etc., but I probably won&#8217;t, as it would cost something like $150 each to do that.<\/p>\n<p>I imagine I&#8217;ll get the same question as when students see the shelves in my office. <strong>No, I haven&#8217;t read all these &#8211; yet<\/strong>. Some I&#8217;ve read, some I&#8217;ve skimmed, some I just want to be able to read or refer to. I&#8217;m focusing on reading whole debates, both sides, to see what I can learn &#8211; pretty much all 17th and 18th century stuff, with a few 19th c. items thrown in. Some of these authors are extremely sharp, others, blow-hards. All I guarantee is that you can learn by &#8220;listening in&#8221; &#8211; whether that&#8217;s learning by others&#8217; great discoveries, or by their great mistakes. Of course, since I&#8217;m interested in reading both sides of the debates,<strong> this stuff is, taken together, wildly inconsistent<\/strong>. So if you&#8217;re trying to discern my views, don&#8217;t read too much in to my selections.<\/p>\n<p>I&#8217;ll be blogging on some of these from time to time, at least, after I finish going through the range of current-day theories by people in philosophical theology. Enjoy!<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Sometimes, all your main interests converge. Books? Check. Computers? Check. Philosophy and theology? Check. History? Check. The result: http:\/\/trinities.org\/books.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[16,15,4,14,8,9,13,3],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-88","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-books","category-christology","category-heresy-orthodoxy","category-history","category-linkage","category-philosophy","category-theologians","category-theories"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/trinities.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/88","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/trinities.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/trinities.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/trinities.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/trinities.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=88"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/trinities.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/88\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/trinities.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=88"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/trinities.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=88"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/trinities.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=88"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}