Brandon’s Siris blog has recently completed 6 years – it has surely outlived 99.9% of blogs, and is older than trinities, which is 4 this summer! Congrats, Brandon!
In a recent post Brandon takes issue with my recent appeal to the principle that “if every F is a G then there cannot be fewer Gs than Fs”.
Some Trinity theories are inconsistent with the (I think obviously true, self-evident) principle, notably the recent theory by Mike Rea, as well as the much-quoted “Athanasian” Creed. Brandon thinks I’m confused. I am confused, about how he thinks I’m confused. And probably about other things. π
Check out our discussion in the comments following Brandon’s post. (Comment there if you’re interested.)
Related posts:
podcast 213 - Has Bauckham clarified his "divine identity" theory? - Part 1
H.O.G. Questions
Did Jesus have faith in God?
Is the doctrine of the Incarnation prior to & the source of trinitarian doctrine? - Part 2
Dealing with Apparent Contradictions: Part 17 - More Mysterious Interpretations - Nye's Vine-Man (Da...
Is the Trinity logically coherent?
Hays's Nelson Muntz "objection" to unitarian theology
My diabolical "ruse" exposed - drat!
Richard of St. Victorβs De Trinitate, Ch. 20 (Dale)
SCORING THE BURKE β BOWMAN DEBATE β ROUND 6 Part 2 β Bowman
Pingback: trinities - SCORING THE BURKE β BOWMAN DEBATE β ROUND 6 Part 1 β BURKE (DALE)
Comments are closed.