Brandon’s Siris blog has recently completed 6 years – it has surely outlived 99.9% of blogs, and is older than trinities, which is 4 this summer! Congrats, Brandon!
In a recent post Brandon takes issue with my recent appeal to the principle that “if every F is a G then there cannot be fewer Gs than Fs”.
Some Trinity theories are inconsistent with the (I think obviously true, self-evident) principle, notably the recent theory by Mike Rea, as well as the much-quoted “Athanasian” Creed. Brandon thinks I’m confused. I am confused, about how he thinks I’m confused. And probably about other things. 🙂
Check out our discussion in the comments following Brandon’s post. (Comment there if you’re interested.)
Related posts:
"the" Trinity doctrine - Part 2
Questions and (some) answers
Pruss on Latin Trinitarian Perfect Being Theology
The Lost Early History of Unitarian Christian Theology
Christology and Heresy 2 - Monophysites, Chalcedonians, and Nestorians (JT)
reading John 10: with axe-grinding and without
Defining the concept of a unitarian
Did Jesus have faith in God? - Part 5
Counting Wives - a tale of three polygamists - Part 1
What is the Trinity? A Dialogue with Steve Hays – Part 2
Pingback: trinities - SCORING THE BURKE – BOWMAN DEBATE – ROUND 6 Part 1 – BURKE (DALE)
Comments are closed.