podcast 245 – Response to Branson Part 3 – Dueling Definitions
Weighing incompatible definitions of trinitarian theology and unitarian theology.
Weighing incompatible definitions of trinitarian theology and unitarian theology.
Is “monarchical trinitarianism” theologically viable?
Gregory of Nazianzus and John of Damascus held that the one God is the Trinity.
Most Orthodox theologians agree with Catholics and most Protestants that the one God is the Trinity.
A summary of Dr. Branson’s case and an argument against biblical unitarian theology.
Was 381 the dawn of imperially enforced confession of a triune God?
Is the first Catholic conciliar statement about a tripersonal God in the late 9th c.?
Can one be a trinitarian without believing in a tripersonal God?
A new paper on when and how the biggest change in the history of mainstream Christian theology occurred.
Does a doctrine of divine processions entail that the Son is less divine than the Father?
Four authors summarize their views on the Trinity.
Is it true that most ancients lacked the concept of numerical identity?
In the New Testament “God” is nearly always the Father. But what follows from that, exactly?
A blogger mocks the UCA as “the Unitarian Confusion Alliance.” But on what basis?
What does “monarchical trinitarianism” include exactly?
Is E.J. Lowe’s four-category ontology the key to solving the multiple-natures and multiple-modes problems?
Has Dr. William Lane Craig put forward what is plausibly a biblical and possibly true two-natures theory about the Lord Jesus?
Not all engagement is good engagement.
How does one objectively evaluate a definition of a concept, e.g. trinitarian or unitarian?
A prolific apologist embraces so-called “monarchical trinitarianism,” on which the one God just is the Father, not the Trinity.