podcast 319 – Thoughts on my debate with Rogers about Mark – Part 1 – culture clash
Why “that’s just Philosophy” is no excuse for a failure of basic critical thinking.
Why “that’s just Philosophy” is no excuse for a failure of basic critical thinking.
Cross-examinations, discussion, closing statements, and audience Q&A.
“…in the New Testament Jesus is not worshiped ‘as God’ (whatever that may mean) but, instead, with reference to God, as the Son of God, as the Lord appointed by God…”
What is the main thesis of the earliest Christian gospel?
“But I say to you that if you are angry with a brother or sister, you will be liable to judgment; and if you insult a brother or sister, you will be liable to the council; and if you say, ‘You fool,’ you will be liable to the hell of fire.”
“…the doctrine of the Trinity is not in Scripture per se, but is the result of the Church’s interpretation of Scripture.”
“For all its complexity, the biblical doctrine of the Trinity can be stated in seven simple propositions.”
For Justin, is Jesus “distinct in number, but not in substance” from the Father?
Which parts of Channing’s thought do and don’t hold up today?
Is it reasonable to believe in the reported miracles of early Christianity?
Does unitarian Christianity “deny the Divinity of Christ,” preach “morality,” and teach salvation by works?
The anti-Calvinist side of early American unitarian Congregationalist Christianity.
Dr. Michael Bird argues that in Mark, Jesus is “included in the identity” of God.
Does the Gospel According to Mark contain as hidden messages the deity of Christ and the Trinity?
What sort of book is the gospel according to Mark, and what does it really claim about Jesus?
I answer some questions and ask some, in response to this well done book review.
“It’s stunning; there is nothing in the Bible that says Jesus had faith.”
How Trinity theories cause a “blind spot” when reading the New Testament.