podcast 301 – Dr. Daniel Boyarin on John 1
According to Dr. Boyarin, most 1st c. non-Christian Jews could accept John 1:1-13.
According to Dr. Boyarin, most 1st c. non-Christian Jews could accept John 1:1-13.
In this book, I argue that all reference is story-relative. We cannot understand reference to God, nor to his prophets, nor to any other character mentioned in the Jewish, Christian, or Muslim scriptures, without reference to those very scriptures.
A penetrating discussion of John 1 by famous Harvard scholar Andrews Norton.
A trinitarian ought to say No. But why? Doesn’t he accept “the deity of Christ”?
A conversation with the author of the Paideia John commentary on Jesus and God in the fourth gospel.
He said this to Jesus. But was he also addressing the God in Jesus?
A discussion about the fourth gospel with the author of this unique commentary on it.
Why we don’t accept this sort of interpretation.
Does 1 John 1:1-4 show that a “Socinian” take on John 1 is correct?
Early modern unitarian Christian scholars offer a “Socinian” take on John 1.
Does John start his gospel at the same “beginning” as Mark 1:1?
Does the famous “Great Commission” passage at the end of Matthew teach that the one God is a Trinity?
Why no mention of Incarnation in the birth narratives of Matthew and Luke?
Why did Roman rulers and polemicists find early Christianity so alarming, rather than just another religion?
Dr. Hurtado explains the term “early high christology” and what it means when applied to his own work.
Can we simply observe the triune God in the descriptions of Jesus’s baptism?
Who needs the Bible when you can gesture at some philosophical speculations?
Why did I write it? What does the book try to do? Who is it for?