podcast 290 – Is the “Socinian” interpretation of John 1 correct? A conversation with Carlos.
Why we don’t accept this sort of interpretation.
Why we don’t accept this sort of interpretation.
Does 1 John 1:1-4 show that a “Socinian” take on John 1 is correct?
Early modern unitarian Christian scholars offer a “Socinian” take on John 1.
Does John start his gospel at the same “beginning” as Mark 1:1?
Does the famous “Great Commission” passage at the end of Matthew teach that the one God is a Trinity?
Why no mention of Incarnation in the birth narratives of Matthew and Luke?
Why did Roman rulers and polemicists find early Christianity so alarming, rather than just another religion?
Dr. Hurtado explains the term “early high christology” and what it means when applied to his own work.
Can we simply observe the triune God in the descriptions of Jesus’s baptism?
Who needs the Bible when you can gesture at some philosophical speculations?
Why did I write it? What does the book try to do? Who is it for?
A leading Roman Catholic scholar looks at the use of “God” in the New Testament.
“For the New Testament, as for the Hebrew Bible, the principle of unity is clearly the one God…”
How could the Incarnation continue between Good Friday and Easter Sunday?
What does it take to defend conciliar christology… and more?
Does the NT teach that Jesus is a man, or that he is a godman?
Its purpose is to equip you to think through these disputed theological and biblical issues. Appropriately, it’s again available in Three formats.