podcast 301 – Dr. Daniel Boyarin on John 1
According to Dr. Boyarin, most 1st c. non-Christian Jews could accept John 1:1-13.
According to Dr. Boyarin, most 1st c. non-Christian Jews could accept John 1:1-13.
A penetrating discussion of John 1 by famous Harvard scholar Andrews Norton.
Is my definition of the concept unitarian so wide that it would allow in some famous trinitarians?
What does “monarchical trinitarianism” include exactly?
A short video from the UCA about going back to actual New Testament Christology.
A conversation with the author of the Paideia John commentary on Jesus and God in the fourth gospel.
He said this to Jesus. But was he also addressing the God in Jesus?
Is this “beginning” when the cosmos was created by God, or when it was “newly created” through the man Jesus?
“And the Word was God.” Which one? The same mentioned before, or not?
Now I’m making known to you, brothers, the gospel that I proclaimed to you, which you accepted, on which you have taken your stand, and by which you are also being saved if you hold firmly to the message I proclaimed to you—unless, of course, your faith was worthless. For I passed on to you the most important points that I received: The Messiah died… Read More »He is risen!
“Dear Christian, I’ve been meaning to talk to you about God and me.”
Does 1 John 1:1-4 show that a “Socinian” take on John 1 is correct?
Early modern unitarian Christian scholars offer a “Socinian” take on John 1.
Does John start his gospel at the same “beginning” as Mark 1:1?
Do biblical theophanies show that the Challenge argument is unsound?
If Jesus is referred to using the word “theos” (God) in the New Testament, does this imply that he is fully divine?