If Modalism about the Son were true, then…
A claim which implies falsehoods is itself false. Son-modalism is such a claim.
A claim which implies falsehoods is itself false. Son-modalism is such a claim.
Can a Christian sensibly say that Jesus is the Father incarnate?
“Blessed is anyone who endures temptation. Such a one has stood the test and will receive the crown of life that the Lord has promised to those who love him.”
How could the Incarnation continue between Good Friday and Easter Sunday?
What does it take to defend conciliar christology… and more?
Origen sez: you must say that Father and Son are “one God.” But does he think they are?
He assumes that necessarily, any human, as such, is subject to God.
What I would expect to see, if Yahweh himself were to be a man, would be…
“Difference in function does not indicate inferiority in nature.”
Well, OF COURSE God incarnate will have the Father as his god.
“Let the same mind be in you that was in Christ Jesus…”
Post-debate thoughts and more, in dialogue with an ex-biblical-unitarian who is now a trinitarian.
Does my thought experiment offered as an objection to some Incarnation theories only show that a demon too could become a man?
The debate question is: Jesus is human and not divine.
Would Origen agree with some present-day apologists who urge that Jesus and God are one and the same?
No, the NT does not teach that Jesus created the cosmos.
Is it obvious that the cause must temporally precede the effect?
What do both OT and NT clearly teach about who created?