podcast 355 – Dr. Steven Nemes on Trinity theories – Part 2
Did fourth century Christians come to a consensus about “the doctrine of the Trinity”?
Did fourth century Christians come to a consensus about “the doctrine of the Trinity”?
Can a historian conclude that Jesus thought he was God?
An ordinary believer with ordinary reading comprehension can see that “Sharp’s Rule” recommends misinterpretations.
No, God needn’t be “multipersonal” to be “perfect in love.”
Evaluating Dr. Craig’s unique take on “two natures” christology, his “Neo-Apollinarian” theory.
A review of the most interesting trinities podcast episodes from 2021.
“The straightforward meaning of the text is that the Son does not know the time of his return.”
The original meaning of John 1, disentangled from later speculations about Trinity and two natures christology.
A humorous puppet-show about a serious subject: properly understanding what the New Testament teaches about Jesus and God.
What the priest was thinking in charging Jesus with “blasphemy.”
Is the idea of essence the key to understanding Bauckham’s christology of divine identity?
Many are moving from a trinitarian understanding to a unitarian understanding of Christian theology. But not all of their reasons are good reasons…
Can we establish on historical grounds that the historical Jesus thought that he was God?
Dear Christian, I’ve been meaning to talk to you about God and me.
Review of a learned and insightful yet deeply flawed book.
Adventures in theologically-motivated misinterpretation.
Why “that’s just Philosophy” is no excuse for a failure of basic critical thinking.
“But I say to you that if you are angry with a brother or sister, you will be liable to judgment; and if you insult a brother or sister, you will be liable to the council; and if you say, ‘You fool,’ you will be liable to the hell of fire.”
Ten basic questions that need to be answered, and ten more advanced questions.