some clarifications: a reply to McManus – part 2
Being a unitarian Christian requires a bit more than thinking the one God just is the Father.
Being a unitarian Christian requires a bit more than thinking the one God just is the Father.
What does “monarchical trinitarianism” include exactly?
It’s a bummer when one’s narrative about theological development runs into inconvenient facts.
A blogger mocks the UCA as “the Unitarian Confusion Alliance.” But on what basis?
Deep thoughts on “divine nature,” and the agony of defeat.
Is “the doctrine of the Trinity” essential to salvation? To Christianity?
“Ok, I’ve finished watching your presentation, and below is my careful critique of it. … Enjoy.”
Can we simply observe the triune God in the descriptions of Jesus’s baptism?
Doubtful speculation irresponsibly presented as straightforward New Testament doctrine.
Who needs the Bible when you can gesture at some philosophical speculations?
Do Genesis 48, 1 Samuel 3, and Jeremiah 1 refute biblical unitarian views on God and Jesus?
A claim which implies falsehoods is itself false. Son-modalism is such a claim.
God can’t be “perfect in love” unless he is multipersonal?
He assumes that necessarily, any human, as such, is subject to God.
“Difference in function does not indicate inferiority in nature.”
Well, OF COURSE God incarnate will have the Father as his god.