response to Hays’s “review” of What is the Trinity?
Rebutting a slanderous and careless “review” by a blogger.
Complaints
Steve Hays vs. Lexicons, deep thoughts on OT “binitarianism”
More lessons on how not to do apologetics, from a Master.
podcast 214 – Has Bauckham clarified his “divine identity” theory? – Part 2
Is saying that the NT “includes Jesus in the divine identity” clearer than saying in the NT “Jesus is God”?
podcast 213 – Has Bauckham clarified his “divine identity” theory? – Part 1
Is the idea of “divine identity” the key to understanding New Testament christology?
podcast 204 – Conversation with a frustrated trinitarian – Part 1
If only trinitarian scholars majored in consistent, intelligible, fully informed answers!
podcast 203 – White, Qureshi, and Zacharias on YouTube
Responding to YouTube videos by Dr. James White, Mrs. Qureshi, and “The Friendly Banjo Atheist.”
podcast 202 – Gregory of Nazianzus vs. Noah Worcester on subordinationist texts
“Of myself, I can do nothing.” Is this claim about Jesus’s self/person, or only about his “human nature”?
podcast 201 – Kermit Zarley on Reformation – Part 2
How could God allow the church to err on something so important?
Tuggy rallies to knockout
Can a unitarian Christian explain why God has the capacity for interpersonal love?
Hays’s Nelson Muntz “objection” to unitarian theology
Real arguments vs. pointed questions combined with incredulous tone.
podcast 193 – Review of Sanders’s The Deep Things of God – Part 2
What, according to Dr. Sanders, is the crisis in contemporary trinitarian systematic theology, when it comes to the Bible?
Kimel’s review of What is the Trinity – Part 4
The real question, I think, is whether or not this idea about “God” is consistent with biblical teaching.
podcast 192 – Review of Sanders’s The Deep Things of God – Part 1
“The Gospel is Trinitarian.” What does this mean, and is it both true and non-trivial?
Kimel’s review of What is the Trinity – Part 2
Kimel lampoons the biblical unitarian historical narrative, and urges that Irenaeus is a big problem for it.
Kimel’s review of What is the Trinity – Part 1
Synopsis: I’m not Eastern Orthodox, so am incompetent to discuss the Trinity, and I’m somehow missing the whole point.
Some clarifications for Dr. White
Dr. James White’s stated reasons for not debating me are based on misunderstanding.
