podcast 301 – Dr. Daniel Boyarin on John 1
According to Dr. Boyarin, most 1st c. non-Christian Jews could accept John 1:1-13.
According to Dr. Boyarin, most 1st c. non-Christian Jews could accept John 1:1-13.
Is God’s spirit in the New Testament supposed to be a self in addition to God and his Son?
A conversation about whether or not the New Testament teaches “Trinity Monotheism.”
A penetrating discussion of John 1 by famous Harvard scholar Andrews Norton.
Does it make sense to say that God is a soul with three cognitive and volitional faculties – but is nonetheless not a self?
A conversation on Dr. William Lane Craig’s unique take on the Trinity.
A conversation with the author of the Paideia John commentary on Jesus and God in the fourth gospel.
A discussion about the fourth gospel with the author of this unique commentary on it.
Is this “beginning” when the cosmos was created by God, or when it was “newly created” through the man Jesus?
“And the Word was God.” Which one? The same mentioned before, or not?
Why we don’t accept this sort of interpretation.
“Dear Christian, I’ve been meaning to talk to you about God and me.”
Does 1 John 1:1-4 show that a “Socinian” take on John 1 is correct?
Early modern unitarian Christian scholars offer a “Socinian” take on John 1.
Does John start his gospel at the same “beginning” as Mark 1:1?
Is “the doctrine of the Trinity” essential to salvation? To Christianity?
If Jesus is referred to using the word “theos” (God) in the New Testament, does this imply that he is fully divine?
Does the famous “Great Commission” passage at the end of Matthew teach that the one God is a Trinity?
John 17:1-3, closing statements, and audience Q&A. Which side made the stronger case?