podcast 348 – Novatian’s On the Trinity – Part 2 – Two Thieves and Three Arguments
A very revealing collection of mid-third-century theological arguments.
A very revealing collection of mid-third-century theological arguments.
The original meaning of John 1, disentangled from later speculations about Trinity and two natures christology.
“In essentials, unity; in non-essentials liberty; in all things, love.” So far, so good. But, what does Scripture say is essential teaching about Christ and about God?
What would we expect to find in the New Testament writings if the authors thought Jesus was a man, a god, or a godman?
A humorous puppet-show about a serious subject: properly understanding what the New Testament teaches about Jesus and God.
Many are moving from a trinitarian understanding to a unitarian understanding of Christian theology. But not all of their reasons are good reasons…
Ten basic questions that need to be answered, and ten more advanced questions.
What sort of book is the gospel according to Mark, and what does it really claim about Jesus?
A blogger mocks the UCA as “the Unitarian Confusion Alliance.” But on what basis?
Is this “beginning” when the cosmos was created by God, or when it was “newly created” through the man Jesus?
Why we don’t accept this sort of interpretation.
Does 1 John 1:1-4 show that a “Socinian” take on John 1 is correct?
Early modern unitarian Christian scholars offer a “Socinian” take on John 1.
Does John start his gospel at the same “beginning” as Mark 1:1?