The Trinity Challenge, from a Sufi Muslim blog. The comments there are wild and wooly. There’s a charge of polytheism, and some non-trinitarian Christians weigh in.
The challenge, of course, cannot be met. But it seems to me he’s carelessly overlooking the options that the Trinity doctrine is:
(1) implicitly taught in the Bible (i.e. it is deducible from what is there, though not explicitly stated there),
or (2) that the doctrine is the best explanation of what is (explicitly and implicitly) taught there.
It’s sort of cheap to insist that either the doctrine is explicitly stated, or it ain’t in the Bible at all.
Compare: this poll here at trinities.
Related posts:
podcast 339 - Does the New Testament teach that Jesus is truly divine? - Loke vs. Tuggy - Part 1
Scott Williams's new paper: Henry of Ghent on Real Relations and the Trinity
William Lane Craig in the Chronicle of Higher Education
no, Jesus is not a fictional character
podcast 274 - McManus on Oneness Pentecostal Christology
Allah = God?
dialogue on God, Jesus, and identity with Alvin Kimel
John 8 brought to life
podcast 269 - Why debate theology?
podcast 261 - How to Argue that the Bible is Trinitarian - Response to Bowman