The Trinity Challenge, from a Sufi Muslim blog. The comments there are wild and wooly. There’s a charge of polytheism, and some non-trinitarian Christians weigh in.
The challenge, of course, cannot be met. But it seems to me he’s carelessly overlooking the options that the Trinity doctrine is:
(1) implicitly taught in the Bible (i.e. it is deducible from what is there, though not explicitly stated there),
or (2) that the doctrine is the best explanation of what is (explicitly and implicitly) taught there.
It’s sort of cheap to insist that either the doctrine is explicitly stated, or it ain’t in the Bible at all.
Compare: this poll here at trinities.
Related posts:
Important new open access journal: The Journal of Analytic Theology
Discussing Dawkins, God, and evil @ triablogue
podcast 105 - Dr. James Spiegel on The Making of an Atheist
Craig, White, and Cerberus
building on an apostolic foundation
trinities turns 5
Credo House Ministries' Inaccuracies about the Trinity and the Council of Nicea
no, Jesus is not a fictional character
the "Functional Polytheism" accusation
podcast 321 - Evaluating Minton's Three Arguments that Jesus is Yahweh