In this recent piece in Books & Culture, I think Prof. Jacobs makes a lot of excellent points.
Can this blog be an exception? (As this blog is, as well as this one.) I hope so! Specifically, I hope that the following factors can minimize the problems Jacobs discusses:
- posting at a decent pace (no Instapundit-like continuous flow)
- leaving the comments open
- occasional weeding out of comments posted by meatheads
- maintaining an atmosphere of respect
- narrow focus
- soliciting comments and guest-postings from other philosophers & theologians who work on this topic
As I’m new at this, any other suggestions from veteran bloggers would be appreciated.
Related posts:
Leftow update
Boyd: a broken Trinity?
podcast 342 - New Year, New Podcasts!
Linkage: Discussing Fs and Gs with Brandon (Dale)
update to "Trinity" in the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
Craig on the historicity of the Adam and Eve story
podcast 50 - Muslim apologist Dr. Laurence B. Brown on the Trinity
"On Positive Mysterianism"
Deviant Calvinism roundup 1 - Crisp on Crisp
He is risen... so not reincarnated
Pingback: Middlebrow » Trinitarian Philosophical Theology on the web
Hey Tom – of course I remember you. Congrats on finishing off that paper your cowrote, and getting it accepted. Thanks – glad you’re reading!
Dale
Dale-
Congrats on the new blog. Nice.
You won’t remember me, but (with Alan Rhoda) we did a bit of emailing over open theism last year. Hope you’re doing well.
Hope to digest your thoughts on the Trinity.
Tom
Pingback: 46313 Blog Verification
Comments are closed.