If Modalism about the Son were true, then…
A claim which implies falsehoods is itself false. Son-modalism is such a claim.
A claim which implies falsehoods is itself false. Son-modalism is such a claim.
Can a Christian sensibly say that Jesus is the Father incarnate?
“For the New Testament, as for the Hebrew Bible, the principle of unity is clearly the one God…”
“Blessed is anyone who endures temptation. Such a one has stood the test and will receive the crown of life that the Lord has promised to those who love him.”
God can’t be “perfect in love” unless he is multipersonal?
How could the Incarnation continue between Good Friday and Easter Sunday?
What does it take to defend conciliar christology… and more?
Origen sez: you must say that Father and Son are “one God.” But does he think they are?
He assumes that necessarily, any human, as such, is subject to God.
What I would expect to see, if Yahweh himself were to be a man, would be…
“Difference in function does not indicate inferiority in nature.”
Well, OF COURSE God incarnate will have the Father as his god.
“Let the same mind be in you that was in Christ Jesus…”