podcast 270 – Origen’s “one God”
Origen sez: you must say that Father and Son are “one God.” But does he think they are?
Origen sez: you must say that Father and Son are “one God.” But does he think they are?
He assumes that necessarily, any human, as such, is subject to God.
What I would expect to see, if Yahweh himself were to be a man, would be…
“Difference in function does not indicate inferiority in nature.”
Well, OF COURSE God incarnate will have the Father as his god.
“Let the same mind be in you that was in Christ Jesus…”
When I find something on YouTube which is actually helpful, I am pleasantly surprised, and feel the need to share it.
Why he dismissed biblical unitarian theology and why he decided to give it another look.
Andrew Davis on the church fathers, the Bible, and finding his way through clashing theologies.
Post-debate thoughts and more, in dialogue with an ex-biblical-unitarian who is now a trinitarian.
Do I ignore “the” being/Person distinction?
How can they respond to an argument which shows that they collapse the Father/Son distinction?
Does my thought experiment offered as an objection to some Incarnation theories only show that a demon too could become a man?
Interrogations, closing statements, and audience Q & A.
Does the NT teach that Jesus is a man, or that he is a godman?
The debate question is: Jesus is human and not divine.