“What, is the Son supposed to be an atheist?” – Part 2
“Difference in function does not indicate inferiority in nature.”
“Difference in function does not indicate inferiority in nature.”
Well, OF COURSE God incarnate will have the Father as his god.
“Let the same mind be in you that was in Christ Jesus…”
When I find something on YouTube which is actually helpful, I am pleasantly surprised, and feel the need to share it.
Why he dismissed biblical unitarian theology and why he decided to give it another look.
Andrew Davis on the church fathers, the Bible, and finding his way through clashing theologies.
Post-debate thoughts and more, in dialogue with an ex-biblical-unitarian who is now a trinitarian.
Do I ignore “the” being/Person distinction?
How can they respond to an argument which shows that they collapse the Father/Son distinction?
Does my thought experiment offered as an objection to some Incarnation theories only show that a demon too could become a man?
Interrogations, closing statements, and audience Q & A.
Does the NT teach that Jesus is a man, or that he is a godman?
The debate question is: Jesus is human and not divine.
Its purpose is to equip you to think through these disputed theological and biblical issues. Appropriately, it’s again available in Three formats.
Would Origen agree with some present-day apologists who urge that Jesus and God are one and the same?
Do we find trinitarian theologies in early Christian authors?
Arguing about what is essential to a trinitarian theology, and about a seemingly incoherent Trinity theory.
Can it be easily shown that the Bible implies that God is tripersonal?