podcast 182 – White’s case for the Trinity – Part 2
Dr. White vs. John on the thesis of the 4th gospel.
Dr. White vs. John on the thesis of the 4th gospel.
The gospel commits us to more than: “Jesus died” is (somehow or other) true.
James Goetz and Corby Amos on the inconsistent triad about Jesus dying.
Did Jesus only experience the death of another, without dying?
One’s theology can lead one to deny obvious facts about the New Testament.
Is this a powerful, state-of-the-art biblical argument for the Trinity?
He tries his hand at a little ad hoc philosophizing about death.
Dealing with this inconsistent triad can be hard!
Can someone with two natures be essentially immortal and die?
Can evangelical apologists answer the question “How can God die?”
His views seem to have been those of present-day biblical unitarians.
“I will host a bonfire at which I and any of you who feel inclined can come and burn our copies of this book.”
Marcellus’s theology is a key to understanding the post-Nicea controversies.
Steve Hays provides a stellar example of how not to do apologetics.
McLatchie’s mistake about historical, mainstream Christian theologies.
In the reign of Constantius II yet another council offered language to replace Nicea…
Why did Eusebius have to submit his own creed at the famous council of Nicea in 325?
In 344 a meeting of Eastern bishops sent a statement to the West explaining their theology.
What should we think of Athanasius’s ferocious condemnations of those he termed “Arians”?