Dealing with Apparent Contradictions: Part 14 – James Anderson’s Paradox in Christian Theology
A book review I’ve written of philosophical theologian James Anderson’s Paradox in Christian Theology.
A book review I’ve written of philosophical theologian James Anderson’s Paradox in Christian Theology.
Want to debate (or just refute) me? Here are some things you should study.
A blogger mocks the UCA as “the Unitarian Confusion Alliance.” But on what basis?
“Come on, you tired little brain – don’t fail me now.” (No, I don’t really blog naked – serious thought requires having at least your underpants on.)
Joseph Jedwab does an excellent job (here, comments 3 & 4) pressing me for details, and taking a shot at defending the Brower and Rea theory. I wanted to chew a bit on some issues that Joseph and Ian raise before moving on, offering some corrections and other reflections. (And JT – I want to post your lengthy comment (the second one) as a guest post, so we can discuss the priority issue – email me if you object to this promotion. ) Any bold type that appears in quotes here has been added by me.
To non-philosophical readers: I apologize for the over-long load of philosopher-lingo that follows. You may want to skip this one! Read More »Constitution Trinitarianism Part 4: pausing and revisiting some issues
What Origen actually says vs. what trinitarians wish that he’d said.
In the New Testament “God” is nearly always the Father. But what follows from that, exactly?