Skip to content

podcast 138 – Pastor Sean Finnegan’s “Why Did Jesus Die?”

Podcast: Play in new window | Download

Subscribe: Spotify | Email | RSS

Sean Finnegan why did Jesus dieThinking Christians have theorized in many ways about “atonement.” Just what it is about Jesus’s death on the cross that reconciles humans to their maker? Was it a ransom paid to the devil? An example for us to imitate ? A substitution, wherein Jesus absorbed God’s wrath in your place, enabling God to forgive you? A victory over the forces of evil? Or what?

In this talk from the 2016 Theological Conference, Pastor Sean Finnegan discusses the biblical data about why Jesus died, and lays out seven options for understanding Jesus’s unique atonement, then criticizing each. At the end, he takes a stab at constructing a theory faithful to the whole biblical witness.

Does Pastor Finnegan leave out any important option?

And do you agree with his own positive suggestions, presented briefly towards the end?

visit restitutioLinks for this episode:

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Related posts:

SCORING THE BURKE – BOWMAN DEBATE – Round 4 Part 1
Christology and Heresy 1 - What is Nestorianism and Monophysitism? (JT)
Defining the concept of a unitarian
podcast 352 - Kegan Chandler - Jesus' Messianic Self-Awareness and "Early High Christology"
Linkage: Disproving the existence of Hooloovoo?
podcast 327 - Dr. Licona's historical case that Jesus considered himself to be God - Part 2
Daniel Waterland on "The Father is the only God" texts - Part 1
flailing against the New Testament - part 2
too many Jesuses vs. too many "Jesuses"
Important new open access journal: The Journal of Analytic Theology

4 thoughts on “podcast 138 – Pastor Sean Finnegan’s “Why Did Jesus Die?””

  2. ReconcileToReason

    When a scholar redirected my attention from the jealous brother in the Parable of the Prodigal Son to the gracious father, the path of my faith journey forked. Down that new path I stumbled over incongruous stones of atonement dogma as Pastor Finnegan identifies. At a turn in the way, however, I came across Rene Girard’s Mimetic Theory and understanding of Jesus’s death and resurrection in context of the Old Testament practice of scapegoating. Theologian Tony Jones characterizes Professor Girard’s understanding of these things as “A Better Atonement: the Last Scapegoat”. From that point on, the path under foot became more smooth (and is smoother still, my having gained Professor Tuggy’s Biblical Unitarian exegesis).

    Considerable information about Girard’s understanding of Jesus’s atonement is available online. One in particular I find useful is at:

    http://www.touchstonemag.com/archives/article.php?id=16-10-040-i

    Greater depth of understanding in these same regards can be had from James Alison, e.g.:

    http://www.kyrie.com/outer/girard/Girard_and_Theology_Part_I.pdf
    http://www.kyrie.com/outer/girard/Girard_and_Theology_Part_II.pdf

    Thank you Pastor Finnegan. Thank you Drs. Jones and Alison. Thank you Rene Girard. Thank you Professor Tuggy.

  3. Victor Porton

    While reading this article, I finally realized which purpose Jesus died for.

    See my short blog post:

    https://endofgospel.wordpress.com/2015/09/15/purpose-of-jesus-death/

    Its text (with hyperlinks removed):

    Further thinking on the purpose of Jesus’ death, being inspired by
    this article while reading it right now, I propose this theory:

    Christ’s death was to demonstrate that an altruistic person will be
    rewarded (as in Christ’s resurrection and power over the entire heavens
    given) justly, even when at first it seems that this way leads to death.

    This has shown to the heavenly powers that altruism works and leads to life rather than to death as someone may expect.

    And this needs a sacrifice of God himself, because it is necessary to show that even the highest level of altruism is rewarded.

Comments are closed.