Skip to content

podcast 174 – The First Sirmian creed (351)

In the reign of Constantius II yet another council offered language to replace Nicea, and again to condemn Photinus his teacher Marcellus.

At 351 in Sirmium, an eastern council pronounced curses on

  • the condemned views ascribed to Arius
  • other what we can call “extreme subordinationist” views
  • all claims and exegesis perceived as “monarchian,” and
  • some claims which the Nicene creed might be thought to reply.

Yet this creed too is subordinationist; that’s how it preserves monotheism, following earlier catholic traditions.

In this episode I explain the context of Constantius’s reign, discuss the debate at this council involving Photinus, present the “anathemas” that this council added to the recycled creed, and focus on how it secures monotheism. I contrast their method with that of the Nicene bishop Hilary of St. Poitiers (c. 310 – c. 367), one of our sources for this creed. I then trace back this insistence on the language of “one God” to Origen (c. 186-255), and find it in triadic form in Apollinarus of Laodicea (c. 315-392). I suggest that this is a key step in the evolution of catholic tradition from unitarian to trinitarian theology.

[spp-tweet tweet=”Father, Son, and Spirit: “one God” or one god?”]

Links for this episode: