Skip to content

podcast 32 – review of the movie Son of God (2014)

Podcast: Play in new window | Download

Subscribe: Spotify | Email | RSS

son of god bullet hole in hand

Last night I finally saw the 2014 movie Son of God.

I’m not as down on the movie as this guy! Other reviewers point out some inaccuracies of detail. Others say it’s just too compressed.

Me, though I liked the movie, I most noticed what New Testament material they left out, as well as their familiar, confused picture of Jesus and God.

In this episode, my review, and also, some interesting listener feedback. (Got some? Upload your audio file here.)

Click on or download the mp3 file below to play. You can also here this episode on youtube.

Do you listen on itunes? Please rate the podcast here.

Here are some relevant previous posts:

Finally, some other movie Jesuses:

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Related posts:

SCORING THE BURKE – BOWMAN DEBATE – Round 4 Part 1
podcast 90 - Listener Questions 1
Randal Rauser on "You Sophist!"
John A. T. Robinson on "the Word" of John 1
Scoring the Burke - Bowman Debate - Intro
podcast 219 - Thomas Reid on First Principles and Common Sense - Part 1
Her only true love
Craig on the historicity of the Adam and Eve story
He is risen! (Dale)
Further thoughts on Swinburne's God-talk

1 thought on “podcast 32 – review of the movie Son of God (2014)”

  1. Bob

    When you say that traditional trinitarians are agreeing with the Pharisees when they say that interpreting Jesus’ words in Mark 2 (ability to forgive sins) implies Christ’s divinity, this is inaccurate. The Pharisees by their questions are posing a syllogism:
    a) If you can forgive sins you are God.
    b) Jesus is not God.
    c) Therefore Jesus cannot forgive sins.

    Traditional trinitarians merely affirm the first premise. But you affirm the second. So both you and they are in effect “agreeing with the pharisees”. You just agree on different premises.

Comments are closed.