the “Functional Polytheism” accusation
An apologist tries to tag unitarian Christians with some unwelcome words.
An apologist tries to tag unitarian Christians with some unwelcome words.
Want to debate (or just refute) me? Here are some things you should study.
Biblical unitarianism vs. what Dale calls one-self trinitarianism.
“What bothers me most is the rhetorical move you’re making with this claim that everyone before Nicea (or so) was a ‘Unitarian.'”
Some friendly disagreements about the prodigal son, women in Luke, and the deity of Christ in Luke.
Some reasons why we should think that the New Testament writers don’t believe that Jesus literally existed before his time in the womb.
Is the “extra Calvinisticum” both biblical and theologically helpful?
The “extra Calvinisticum” and the coherence of Chalcedonian christology.
Deciding to call just one of the three selves in your christology “Jesus” doesn’t fix the fact that your theory has two too many selves.
When a NT author claims that Jesus fulfills an OT text which is about God, is that his way of saying that Jesus is God?
Is the New Testament position that Christians should only worship God himself?
Can these obvious truths pop the bubbles of various theological and christological speculations?
Have either of two philosophically astute bloggers refuted the Challenge to “Jesus is God” Apologists?
Is the idea of “divine identity” the key to understanding New Testament christology?
Does the gospel of Mark hint that Jesus is Yahweh in the flesh?
“Of myself, I can do nothing.” Is this claim about Jesus’s self/person, or only about his “human nature”?