Podcast: Play in new window | Download
Subscribe: Spotify | Email | RSS
Dr. James R. Gordon’s The Holy One in Our Midst defends the doctrine which has been called the extra Calvinisticum.
Modern theologians have objected that the extra implies an incomplete Incarnation, “Nestorian” heresy, and that only the Word but not the “human nature” of Christ should be worshiped.
In this second part of our conversation (Part 1 here), Dr. Gordon rebuts these charges, and argues that this doctrine is in a sense biblical, and that it is theologically useful.
Do you agree? Why or why not?
Links for this episode:
- Dr. Gordon’s home page
- The Holy One in Our Midst: An Essay on the Flesh of Christ
- Wheaton College Philosophy Department
- podcast 144 – Dr. Timothy Pawl’s In Defense of Conciliar Christology – Part 2
- podcast 143 – Dr. Timothy Pawl’s In Defense of Conciliar Christology – Part 1
- podcast 112 – Dr. Joseph Jedwab on divine omnipresence – Part 2
- podcast 111 – Dr. Joseph Jedwab on divine omnipresence – Part 1
- Clarifying Catholic Christologies
- This week’s thinking music is “The Ants Built A City On His Chest” by Doctor Turtle.
Related posts:
20 classes of facts which show that the NT authors are unitarian
On an alleged counterexample to Leibniz's Law - Part 2 (Dale)
podcast 79 - Dr. John Piper on why not everyone is elect
podcast 246 - Response to Branson Part 4 - the shortcomings of "monarchical trinitarianism"
Richard of St. Victor's De Trinitate Ch.14
Nigel Warburton on contemporary philosophers
Reformed trinitarian to unitarian Christian
What is essential to the gospel, according to Luke? Part 1
podcast 385 - Cold Case Confusion - J. Warner Wallace on the Trinity - Part 1
Dale – Thanks for these efforts.
Greg
Comments are closed.